By: nvphyl
22 Sep 2004, 12:51 PM EDT
Msg. 168409 of 170501
(This msg. is a reply to 168400 by yanks04.)
Jump to msg. #  
yanks

A group I rub elbows with in Vegas in 1996 were very interested in ADVR. The distributor thing was topic A. If there is every any commercial success attached to 118 I don't think we have heard the last of them. I am not a lawyer and could be all wet on the subject. However, that was a long time ago and I have since moved back to Michigan and lost contact. Things may have changed. I do know they expected the drug would be marketable by the end of '96. That is the reason I can post that I am

(Voluntary Disclosure: Position- Long)
 
By: SUE32073
22 Sep 2004, 12:57 PM EDT
Msg. 168411 of 170501
Jump to msg. #  
Maybe it's hidden in Australia??? Or, maybe the dingo ate it!!...LOL

From the last 10-K --


PATENTS
Patent protection and trade secret protection are important to our business and our future will depend, in part, on our ability to maintain trade secret protection, obtain patents and operate without infringing the proprietary rights of others both in the United States and abroad. We have 12 issued U.S. patents, some covering the composition of AVR118 and others covering various
uses of AVR118. We have eight pending U.S. patent applications and 18 pending foreign patent applications. In addition, we have two issued Australian patents
and one issued Chinese patent covering several uses of AVR118. During April 2002, under the terms of a settlement agreement entered as part of a final judgment on March 25, 2002, we were assigned all rights, title and interest in
two issued U.S. patents pertaining to Reticulose technology. As patent applications in the United States are maintained in secrecy until published or
patents issue and as publication of discoveries in the scientific or patent literature often lag behind the actual discoveries, we cannot be certain that we were the first to make the inventions covered by each of our pending patent
applications or that we were the first to file patent applications for such inventions. Furthermore, the patent positions of biotechnology and pharmaceutical companies are highly uncertain and involve complex legal and
factual questions, and, therefore, the breadth of claims allowed in biotechnology and pharmaceutical patents or their enforceability cannot be predicted. We cannot be sure that any additional patents will issue from any of
our patent applications or, should any patents issue, that we will be provided with adequate protection against potentially competitive products. Furthermore,
we cannot be sure
that any patents will be of commercial value to us, or that private parties, including competitors, will not successfully challenge our patents or circumvent
our patent position in the United States or abroad.

In the absence of adequate patent protection, our business may be adversely affected by competitors who develop comparable technology or products.
Moreover, pursuant to the terms of the Uruguay Round Agreements Act, patents filed on or after June 8, 1995 have a term of 20 years from the date of such filing, irrespective of the period of time it may take for such patent to ultimately issue. This may shorten the period of patent protection afforded to our products as patent applications in the biopharmaceutical sector often take
considerable time to issue. Under the Drug Price Competition and Patent Term Restoration Act of 1984 (the "Patent Act"), a sponsor may obtain marketing
exclusivity for a period of time following FDA approval of certain drug applications, regardless of patent status, if the drug is a new chemical entity or if new clinical studies were used to support the marketing application for
the drug. Pursuant to the FDA Modernization Act of 1997, the period of exclusivity can be extended if the applicant performs certain studies in pediatric patients. This marketing exclusivity prevents a third party from
obtaining FDA approval for a similar or identical drug under an Abbreviated New Drug Application ("ANDA") or a "505(b)(2)" New Drug Application. The statute
also allows a patent owner to obtain an extension of applicable patent terms for a period equal to one-half the period of time elapsed between the filing of an
IND and the filing of the corresponding NDA plus the period of time between the filing of the NDA and FDA approval, with a five year maximum patent extension.
We cannot be sure that we will be able to take advantage of either the patent term extension or marketing exclusivity provisions of this law.

In order to protect the confidentiality of our technology, including trade secrets and know-how and other proprietary technical and business information, we require all of our employees, consultants, advisors and
collaborators to enter into confidentiality agreements that prohibit the use or
disclosure of information that is deemed confidential. The agreements also
oblige our employees, consultants, advisors and collaborators to assign to us
developments, discoveries and inventions made by such persons in connection with
their work with us. We cannot be sure that confidentiality will be maintained or
disclosure prevented by these agreements or that our proprietary information or
intellectual property will be protected thereby or that others will not
independently develop substantially equivalent proprietary information or
intellectual property.

The pharmaceutical industry is highly competitive and patents have been
applied for by, and issued to, other parties relating to products competitive
with AVR118. Therefore, AVR118 and any other drug candidates may give rise to
claims that they infringe the patents or proprietary rights of other parties
existing now and in the future. Furthermore, to the extent that we or our
consultants or research collaborators use intellectual property owned by others
in work performed for us, disputes may also arise as to the rights in such
intellectual property or in related or resulting know-how and inventions. An
adverse claim could subject us to significant liabilities to such other parties
and/or require disputed rights to be licensed from such other parties. We cannot
be sure that any license required under any such patents or proprietary rights
would be made available on terms acceptable to us, if at all. If we do not
obtain such licenses, we may encounter delays in product market introductions,
or may find that the development, manufacture or sale of products requiring such
licenses may be precluded. In addition, we could incur substantial costs in
defending ourselves in legal proceedings instituted before the PTO or in a suit
brought against it by a private party based on such patents or proprietary
rights, or in suits by us asserting our patent or proprietary rights against
another party, even if the outcome is not adverse to us. There are extensions
available under the Patent Act if the delay in prosecution of the patent
application results from a delay in the PTO's handling of any interference or
appeal involving the application. We have not conducted any searches or made any
independent investigations of the existence of any patents or proprietary rights
of other parties.



 
By: SUE32073
22 Sep 2004, 01:05 PM EDT
Msg. 168414 of 170501
Jump to msg. #  
Uh oh, the SEC document states 12 issued Patents; I only found 10. Anyone else know what the other two (2) Patents are:

PAT. NO. Title
6,696,422 Combination therapy for HIV infections
6,670,118 Method for treating papillomavirus infections
6,528,098 Preparation of a therapeutic composition
6,440,658 Assay method for determining Product R's effect on adenovirus infection of Hela cells
6,355,226 Topical treatment of skin disease and eye afflictions
6,303,153 Preparation of a therapeutic composition
6,268,349 Method for treating B19 parvovirus infections
5,849,196 Composition containing peptides and nucleic acids and methods of making same
5,807,840 Method for treating canine distemper
5,807,839 Method for stimulating red blood cell production


 
By: buckaroobanzai10
22 Sep 2004, 01:07 PM EDT
Msg. 168416 of 170501
(This msg. is a reply to 168414 by SUE32073.)
Jump to msg. #  
The other two patents may refer to issued patents in other countries.

 
By: SUE32073
22 Sep 2004, 01:11 PM EDT
Msg. 168417 of 170501
(This msg. is a reply to 168416 by buckaroobanzai10.)
Jump to msg. #  
Wouldn't your theory then make the number 13. Remember, we talking U.S. Patents issued.

"We have 12 issued U.S. patents, some covering the composition of AVR118 and others covering various
uses of AVR118.

We have eight pending U.S. patent applications and 18 pending foreign patent applications.

In addition, we have two issued Australian patents
and one issued Chinese patent covering several uses of AVR118."

 
By: lovingitall0
22 Sep 2004, 01:14 PM EDT
Msg. 168419 of 170501
Jump to msg. #  
A method of ameliorating a symptom of rheumatoid arthritis in a patient suffering from rheumatoid arthritis,


http://appft1.uspto.gov/netacgi/nph-Parser?Sect1=PTO2&Sect2=HITOFF&p=1&u=%2Fnetahtml%2FPTO%2Fsearch-adv.html&r=1&f=G&l=50&d=PG01&S1=20020013284.PGNR.&OS=DN/20020013284&RS=DN/20020013284

 

[Help] [Home] [Boolean Search] [Manual] [Number Search] [PTDLs]

[CURR_LIST]
[Shopping Cart] [Order Copy]

[Image]

 

      ( 1 of 1 )

United States Patent Application 20020013284
Kind Code A1
HIRSCHMAN, SHALOM Z. January 31, 2002

METHOD FOR TREATING AUTOIMMUNE DISEASES

 

Abstract

A method of treating patients having rheumatoid arthritis by administering Product R, a peptide-nucleic acid preparation, is disclosed.


Inventors: HIRSCHMAN, SHALOM Z.; (RIVERDALE, NY)
Correspondence Name and Address:
    MYRON COHEN ESQ
    COHEN PONTANI LIEBERMAN & PAVANE
    551 FIFTH AVENUE
    SUITE 1210
    NEW YORK
    NY
    10176
Serial No.: 316624
Series Code: 09
Filed: May 21, 1999

 

U.S. Current Class: 514/44; 514/2
U.S. Class at Publication: 514/44; 514/2
Intern'l Class: A01N 043/04; A01N 037/18

Claims




I claim:

1. A method of ameliorating a symptom of rheumatoid arthritis in a patient suffering from rheumatoid arthritis, comprising parenterally administering to said patient an effective symptom ameliorating amount of product R in a range from about 2.5 microliter to about 40 microliters per kilogram of body weight per day in a pharmaceutically acceptable formulation.

2. The method of claim 1 wherein said Product R is administered in a range from about 5 microliters to about 25 microliters per kilogram of body weight per day.

3. The method of claim 1 wherein said Product R is administered in amount of about 7.5 microliters per kilogram of body weight per day.

4. A method of ameliorating a symptom of rheumatoid arthritis in a patient suffering from rheumatoid arthritis, comprising the steps of: a. parenterally administering Product R to said patient an effective symptom ameliorating amount of about 1 ml twice per day in a pharmaceutically acceptable formulation for about 15 days; and b. Parenterally administering Product R to said patient an effective symptom ameliorating amount of about 1 ml once per day in a pharmaceutically acceptable formulation for about 75 days after step a.


Description




BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION

[0001] 1. Field of the Invention

[0002] The present invention relates to a method for using Product R as hereinafter defined to treat patients having rheumatoid arthritis.

[0003] 2. Description of the Related Art

[0004] Autoimmune diseases in mammals can generally be classified in one of two different categories: cell-mediated disease (i.e. T-cell) or antibody-mediated disorders. Non-limiting examples of cell-mediated autoimmune diseases include multiple sclerosis, rheumatoid arthritis, autoimmune thyroiditis, diabetes mellitus (Juvenile onset diabetes) and autoimmune uveoretinitis. Antibody-mediated autoimmune disorders include myasthenia gravis and systemic lupus erythematosus (or SLE).

[0005] Diseases with autoimmune features affect well over 5 percent of individuals at some time in their life. A large group of disparate autoimmune diseases are characterized by an often intense, sustained and injurious immune response apparently directed to a self-antigen. Autoimmunity is not a generalized state, but rather each disease reflects a highly specific pattern of recognition of different self structures and likely reflects equally distinct immune recognition events. These disorders vary from relatively mild conditions to those that virulently attack critical cells and organs of the body.

[0006] Autoimmune diseases may be classified as organ specific or non-orgain specific depending on whether the response is primarily against either antigens localized to particular organs or widespread antigens. In organ specific diseases typified by Hashimoto's thyroiditis, lesions are restricted because the antigen in the organ acts as a target for immunological attack. In non-organ specific disease typified by systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE), complexes formed with the antigens involved are deposited systemically, particularly in the kidney, joints and skin, so giving rise to the more diseminated features of the disease.

[0007] Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) is an inflammatory, multisystem disease characterized clinically as a relapsing disease of acute or insidious onset that may involve any organ in the body. Clinically, symptoms are due to disease affecting the skin, kidneys, serosal membranes, joints and heart. Anatomically, all sites have in common vascular lesions with fibrinoid deposits and immunologically, the disease involves antibodies of autoimmune origin, especially antinuclear antibodies (ANA). The ANA are directed against both DNA and RNA. Autoantibody development appears to be multifactorial in origin, involving genetic, hormonal, immunologic and environmental factors.

[0008] Rheumatoid arthritis is a systemic, chronic, inflammatory disease that affects principally the joints and sometimes many other organs and tissues throughout the body. The disease is characterized by a nonsuppurative proliferative synovitis, which in time leads to the destruction of articular cartilage and progressive disabling arthritis. The disease is caused by persistent and self-perpetuating inflammation resulting from immunologic processes taking place in the joints. As is the case with most autoimmune diseases, the trigger that initiates the immune reaction remains unidentified. Both humoral and cell mediated immune responses are involved in the pathogenesis of rheumatoid arthritis. The majority of patients have elevated levels of serum immunoglobulins and essentially all patients have an antibody called rheumatoid factor (RF) directed against a component of another antibody class.

[0009] Multiple sclerosis is another disease that is thought to be caused by autoimmune mechanisms. The cause of multiple sclerosis is unknown but seems to be multifactorial. Susceptibility or resistance may be genetically determined; something in the environment interacts with the human host at the proper age to cause biochemical and structural lesions in the central nervous system. The systemic immune response and the response of the central nervous system become involved. Although the cause and pathogenesis of multiple sclerosis are unknown, it is widely believed that immune abnormalities are somehow related to the disease. Three possible mechanisms have been postulated: infection, autoimmunity, and a combination of the two. Suppression or modulation of the immune responses may be the key.

[0010] Myasthenia gravis is an autoimmune disorder caused by antibodies directed against the acetylcholine receptor of skeletal muscle. Present information indicates at least three mechanisms whereby acetylcholine receptor antibody may interfere with neuromuscular transmission and thus induce myasthenia gravis. Acetylcholine receptor antibody may interfere (directly or indirectly) with acetylcholine receptor function. In both experimental allergic myasthenia gravis and human myasthenia gravis, the extent of acetylcholine receptor loss parallels the clinical severity of the disease, suggesting that acetylcholine receptor antibody-induced acceleration of acetylcholine receptor degradation is important in the development of myasthenia gravis. Complement-mediated destruction of the postsynaptic region is the third possible cause. Other disorders, especially those presumed to be autoimmune in origin, can occur in association with myasthenia gravis. Thyroid disease, rheumatoid arthritis, systemic lupus erythematosus, and pernicious anemia all occur more commonly with myasthenia gravis than would be expected by chance.

[0011] Implication of viruses in autoimmunity has been supported by findings that autoimmune responses are induced, accelerate or enhanced concomitant with infection by a wide variety of human DNA and RNA viruses. Using an investigative approach that focuses on one potential mechanism where microbes cause autoimmunity, or molecular mimicry, a number of etiologic agents have been identified as potential causes of autoimmune disease.

[0012] Certain viruses have a mitogenic effect on unique lymphocyte subsets and hence act as polyclonal activators. Viruses can also infect lymphocytes and macrophage and directly or through their proteins cause release of lymphokines and manikines. These molecules can modulate immune responses in a variety of ways, including as growth or differentiation factors or by regulating MHC class I and/or class II expression on cells. Finally, microbial agents share determinants with host self proteins. In this instance, an immune response mounted by the host against a specific determinant of the infecting agent may cross-react with the mimic (shared) host sequence, leading to autoimmunity and, in some cases, tissue injury and disease.

[0013] The current treatments for both categories of autoimmune diseases involve administration of drugs which non-specifically suppress the immune response. Examples of such drugs are methotrexate, cyclophosphamide, Imuran (azathioprine) and cyclosporin A., steroid compounds such as prednisone and methylprednisilone are also employed in many instances. These drugs have limited efficacy against both cell- and antibody-mediated autoimmune diseases. Use of such drugs is limited by virtue of their toxic side effects and also because they induce "global" immunosuppression in a patient receiving prolonged treatment with the drug, e.g. the normal protective immune response to pathogenic microorganisms is downregulated thereby increasing the risk of infections caused by these pathogens. A further drawback is that there is an increased risk that malignancies will develop in patients receiving prolonged global immunosuppression.

[0014] Reticulose.sup.1 emerged as an antiviral product in the 1930's. While it was originally believed to be a product composed of peptone, peptides and nucleic acids, the precise composition remains unidentified. Nevertheless, Reticulose has demonstrated an ability to inhibit rapidly the course of several viral diseases. It is nontoxic, miscible with tissue fluids and blood sera and free from anaphylactogenic properties. Product R is a refinement of Reticulose prepared by an improved manufacturing process. It is a peptide nucleic acid preparation with defined composition. .sup.1 The agent was known under the trademark "Reticulose", a trademark of Advance Viral Research.

[0015] Insofar as the applicant knows, Product R has never been used, nor suggested for treating autoimmune diseases.

SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION

[0016] An object of this invention therefore is to provide a method for treating a patient having autoimmune diseases by administering parenterally an effective treatment amount of Product R, a peptide-nucleic acid preparation, to the patient.

[0017] Product R is particularly useful in treating patients identified as having autoimmune disease rheumatoid arthritis.

[0018] Specifically, Product R is administered parenterally to the patients in a range from about 2.5 microliter to about 40 microliter per kilogram of the patient's body weight per day in a sterile injectable formulation. Prednisone is co-administered with Product R to the patients orally in a range from about 0.065 to about 1.35 milligram per kilogram of the patient's body weight per day.

[0019] Other objects and features of the present invention will become apparent from the following detailed description considered in conjunction with the accompanying drawings. It is to be understood, however, that the drawings are designed solely for purposes of illustration and not as a definition of the limits of the invention, for which reference should be made to the appended claims.

[0020] The various features of novelty which characterize the invention are pointed out with particularity in the claims annexed to and forming a part of the disclosure. For a better understanding of the invention, its operating advantages, and specific objects attained by its use, reference should be had to the drawing and descriptive matter in which there are illustrated and described preferred embodiments of the invention.

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

[0021] In the drawings:

[0022] FIG. 1A shows the reduction of spontaneous pain resulting from the treatment with Product R.

[0023] FIG. 1B shows the reduction of the applied pressure pain resulting from the treatment with Product R.

[0024] FIG. 1C shows the reduction of the movement pain resulting from the treatment with Product R.

[0025] FIG. 2 shows the reduction of tumefaction of soft tissues resulting from the treatment with Product R.

[0026] FIG. 3 shows the reduction of morning stiffness resulting from Product R treatment.

[0027] FIG. 4 shows the mobility of the most affected joints before and after the treatment with Product R.

[0028] FIG. 5 shows the improvements of various activities that were hindered by rheumatoid arthritis.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE PRESENTLY PREFERRED EMBODIMENTS

[0029] As used herein, Product R is the product produced according to either of the following methods.

Method I For Preparing Product R

[0030] Suspend about 35.0 g of casein, about 17.1 g of beef peptone, about 22.0 g of nucleic acid (RNA), about 3.25 g bovine serum albumin in about 2.5 liters of water for injection USP at about 3 to 7.degree. C. in a suitable container and gently stir until all the ingredients have been properly wet. Carefully add while stirring about 16.5 g of sodium hydroxide (reagent grade ACS) and continue stirring until sodium hydroxide completely dissolved. Autoclave at about 9 lbs pressure and 200-230.degree. F. for a period of time until RNA is completely digested, for example, about 4 hours. At the end of the period, the autoclave is stopped and the reaction flask and contents are permitted to slowly cool to ambient temperature. Then cool for at least six hours at about 3-8.degree. C. The resulting solution is filtered through 2 micron and 0.45 micron filters using inert gas such as nitrogen or argon at low pressure (1-6 psi). In a similar manner the solution is filtered again through 0.2 micron pyrogen retention filters. The resulting filtrate is sampled and assayed for total nitrogen. A calculation is then performed to determine the quantity of cooled water for injection to be added to the filtrate to yield a diluted filtrate with a nitrogen content between about 165-210 mg/ml, the final volume is approximately 5 liters. The pH is then adjusted with either concentrated HCl (reagent grade ACS) or 1.0 normal NaOH to about 7.3-7.6 range. The diluted solution is then filtered again through 0.2 micron filters with inert gas at low pressure. The final filtrate is then filled and sealed into 2 ml glass ampules while in an inert gas atmosphere. The ampules are collected and autoclave for final sterilization at 240.degree. F. and 20 to 30 pounds pressure for about 30 minutes. Following the sterilization cycle, the ampules with Product R are cooled and washed.

[0031] All quantities are subject to plus or minus 2.5% variation for pH, volume, and analytical adjustments.

Method II For Preparing Product R

[0032] Suspend about 35.0 g of casein, about 17.1 g of beef peptone, about 22.0 g of nucleic acid (RNA), about 3.25 g bovine serum albumin in about 2.5 liters of water for injection USP at about 3 to 7.degree. C. in a suitable container and gently stir until all the ingredients have been properly wet. Slowly add while stirring about 11.75 ml of hydrochloric acid (reagent grade ACS) and continue stirring until hydrochloric acid is completely dissolved. Autoclave at about 9 lbs pressure and 200- 230.degree. F. for a period of time until RNA is completely digested, for example, about 4 hours. At the end of the period, the autoclave is stopped and the reaction flask and contents are permitted to slowly cool to ambient temperature. Then cool for at least six hours at about 3-8.degree. C. The resulting solution is filtered through 2 micron and 0.45 micron filters using inert gas such as nitrogen or argon at low pressure (1-6 psi). In a similar manner the solution is filtered again through 0.2 micron pyrogen retention filters. The resulting filtrate is sampled and assayed for total nitrogen. A calculation is then performed to determine the quantity of cooled water for injection to be added to the filtrate to yield a diluted filtrate with a nitrogen content between about 165-210 mg/ml, the final volume is approximately 5 liters. The ph is then adjusted with either concentrated HCL (reagent grade ACS) or 35% (w/v) of NaOH to about 7.3-7.6 range. The diluted solution is then filtered again through 0.2 micr on filters with inert gas at low pressure. The final filtrate is then filled and sealed into 2 ml glass ampules while in an inert gas atmosphere. The ampules are collected and autoclave for final sterilization at 240.degree. F. and 20 to 30 pounds pressure for about 30 minutes. Following the sterilization cycle, the ampules with Product R are cooled and washed.

[0033] All quantities are subject to plus or minus 2.5% variation for pH, volume, and analytical adjustments.

[0034] Product R may administered alone or together with an autoimmune disease treatment agent. When administered to the patients, Product R may be applied parenterally, the autoimmune disease treatment agent, e.g. prednisone may be administered orally. The combination of Product R and prednisone may be applied either simultaneously or in alternation.

[0035] For the above autoimmune diseases, a suitable effective dose of Product R is in the range from about 2.5 microliter to about 40 microliter per kilogram of body weight per day, preferably in the range of about 5 microliter to about 25 microliter per kilogram of body weight per day. Most preferably Product R is administered in an amount of about 7.5 microliter per kilogram of body weight per day. The desired dose may be administered as two, three or more sub-doses at appropriate intervals, generally equally spread in time, throughout the day. Preferably, however, the full daily dose is administered in one administration.

[0036] Product R may be administered by any suitable injection route including, but not limited to intravenously, intraperitoneal, subcutaneously, intramuscularly, and intradermally, etc. The presently preferred route of administration is intramuscularly. It will be appreciated that the preferred route may vary with, for example, the condition and age of the recipient.

[0037] While it is possible for Product R to be administered as part of a pharmaceutical formulation, it is preferable to present it alone, although it may be administered at about the same time as one or more other pharmaceuticals are independently administered. If Product R is administered as part of a pharmaceutical formulation, the formulations of the present invention comprise at least one administered ingredient, as above defined, together with one or more acceptable carriers thereof and optionally other therapeutic ingredients. The carrier(s) must be "acceptable" in the sense of being compatible with the other ingredients of the formulation and not deleterious to the recipient thereof. Preferably, Product R constitutes at least about 90% of such formulation by.

[0038] The formulations may conveniently be presented in unit-dose or multi-dose containers, e.g. sealed ampules and vials.

[0039] Preferred unit dosage formulations are those containing a daily dose or unit, daily sub-dose, or an appropriate fraction of the administered ingredient.

[0040] Prednisone is co-administered with Product R to provide a combined therapy in treating autoimmune diseases. While it is possible for the active ingredients of prednisone to be administered alone, it is preferable to present them as pharmaceutical formulations. The formulations comprise at least one active ingredient, together with one or more acceptable carriers therefore and optionally other therapeutic ingredients. The carrier(s) must be "acceptable" in the sense of being compatible with the other ingredients of the formulation and not deleterious to the patient thereof.

[0041] The formulations for prednisone includes those suitable for oral administration.

[0042] The formulations may conveniently be presented in unit dosage form and may be prepared by any of the methods well known in the art of pharmacy. Such methods include the step of bringing into association the active ingredient with the carrier which constitutes one or more accessory ingredients. In general, the formulations are prepared by uniformly and intimately bringing into association the active ingredient with liquid carriers of finely divided solid carriers or both, and then, if necessary, shaping the products.

[0043] For oral administration, prednisone is calculated as the free base of about 0.065 to 1.35 milligram per kilogram, preferably 0.25 to 0.8 milligram per kilogram, of the patient's body weight per day, and is preferably used in a unit dosage form, and administered a few times daily in the amount of 1 to 50 milligram per unit dose. Dosage of prednisone should be individualized according to the severity of the disease and the response of the patient.

[0044] It should be understood that Product R may also be co-administered with other anti-autoimmune disease agents such as methotrexate, cyclophosphamide, imuran and cyclosporin A, etc. The dose of other anti-autoimmune disease agents to be co-administered with Product R can be readily determined by those skilled in the art, based on the usual patient symptoms, and severity of the diseases.

[0045] A clinical trial to assess the efficacy of Product R in patients suffering from rheumatoid arthritis (RA) has been conducted under a protocol designed by applicant. In this clinical study, twenty-seven female patients ranging in age from 29 to 50 years old, suffering from mild to moderately severe RA for no loner than two years were treated with Product R for a total of 90 days. These patients had been previously treated with Aspirin and/or Paracetamol and/or Arrumalon. Product R was injected subcutaneously at a dose of 1 ml twice per day for 15 days and 1 ml once a day for 75 days. One additional patient, 44 years old, afflicted with severe RA manifested as decrease in articular space, osteopenia and subchondral sclerosis, who was previously treated with gold salts but discontinued due to toxic effects, was injected subcutaneously with Product R at a dose of 2 ml once per day for the first three days followed by 1 ml once per day for 12 months. Two other patients who had suffered from RA for seven and three years respectively where injected subcutaneously with 2 ml of Product R every other day for days, 2 ml every other day for 15 more days and for the next year they were given a maintenance dose of 1 ml a day for 5 consecutive days every 4 months.

[0046] No major or minor side effects were observed or reported. Only one patient reported, on day 90, a mild reaction at the site of injection that lasted two days and resolved by itself.

[0047] The improvement of rheumatoid arthritis were determined according to measurements such as pain, tumefaction of soft tissues, morning stiffness, mobility of the most affected joint, the size of the most affected joint and some laboratory tests.

[0048] FIG. 1A shows the reduction of spontaneous pain resulted from the treatment with Product R. Prior to the treatment, of twenty-seven patients, seven reported no pain, eight reported slight pain, and twelve reported moderated pain, which are represented by the shaded bars. By day thirty of the treatment, five patients reported moderate pain and twelve patients reported slight pain. By day sixty, eleven patients had slight pain. By day ninety, only 5 patients still reported slight pain. The severe RA patient was monitored on days 0, 15, 30 and 45 of the treatment. By day 45, she still experienced moderate spontaneous pain.

[0049] FIG. 1B shows the reduction of the pain produced by applied pressure. All twenty eight patients including the severe RA patient reported moderate (fifteen patients) to severe (thirteen patient) pain before the treatment. By day thirty of the treatment, eleven reported slight pain, fifteen moderate pain and two severe pain. By day sixty, fifteen patients had slight pain and thirteen reported moderate pain. By day ninety, one patient had no pain, twenty five slight pain and two moderate pain.

[0050] FIG. 1C shows the reduction of the pain produced by movements. All 28 patients reported pain produced by movement before the including 11 suffering from slight pain, 16 moderate pain and one severe pain (the severe RA patient). By day 30 of the treatment, 15 reported slight pain, 12 had moderate pain and one had severe pain. By day 60, 6 had no pain, 17 had slight pain and 5 had moderate pain. By day 90, 11 had no pain, 16 had slight pain and one had moderate pain.

[0051] FIG. 2 shows the reduction of tumefaction of soft tissues. All 28 patients had some degree of tumefaction (swell) of soft tissue before the treatment including 10 slight, 17 moderate and one severe tumefaction. By day 30, 5 patients having moderate tumefaction reported slight tumefaction. By day 60, seven more patients changed form moderate to slight tumefaction. By day 90, five patients had complete disappearance of tumefaction, 21 had slight tumefaction and two remained with moderate tumefaction.

[0052] FIG. 3 shows the reduction of morning stiffness resulting from Product R treatment. Of the 28 patients, 22 had morning stiffness, which in 15 patients lasted 15 minutes or more before the Product R treatment. By day 30, one of the 22 patients reported no morning stiffness, and seven reported a reduction of morning stiffness. By day 60, an additional five patients had no morning stiffness and a total of 15 patients had a reduction of morning stiffness. By day 90, a total of 15 patients had no stiffness as compared to 6 before the treatment. 12 patients remained with morning stiffness of 15 minutes or less. One patient remained with morning stiffness of more than 15 minutes.

[0053] FIG. 4 shows the mobility of the most affected joints before and after the treatment with Product R. Mobility was measured by degrees of flexion and extension of the joint. All 28 patients had impaired mobility of the joints. Most patients had affected joints in hands and three patients included impaired feet joints. Flexion ranged from 30 to 50 degrees with the remainder ranging form 80 to 110 degrees. In most cases it took 60 days to see a marked improvement. At that point the improvement became exponential.

[0054] As a measurement of inflammation, the circumference in millimeters of the most affected joint was recorded. Al 27 patients experienced a marked decrease in joint sizes. These decreases were visible in all cases by day 30. The reduction of the circumference of the most affected joint is also shown in FIG. 4.

[0055] FIG. 5 shows the improvements of various activities that were hindered by RA. These activities include:

[0056] Strenuous exercise:

[0057] Before Product R therapy, all 27 patients were limited in their ability to perform strenuous exercises such as running, lifting heavy objects or participation in exhausting sports. 16 patients considered themselves extremely limited and 12 moderately limited. By day 90 of the therapy, two patients reported not being limited at all, 17 were moderately limited and eight still were very limited in their ability to perform strenuous exercise.

[0058] Moderate exercise:

[0059] 19 patients out of the 27 patients considered themselves to be moderately limited in their ability to perform moderate exercises such as moving a table, pushing a vacuum cleaner, bowling or playing golf. By day 90, only six patients were limited in performing moderate exercises.

[0060] Job/Housework:

[0061] 27 patients had problems performing their job or housework at the beginning of the study. By day 90, only seven still had problems but to a much lower degree in all cases.

[0062] Social activities:

[0063] 27 patients had some disability in performing social activities due to their illness at the beginning of the treatment. By day 90, only six still reported problems but all improvements from the pretherapy state.

[0064] Emotional problems:

[0065] 21 patients reported emotional problems due to their disease at the start of the therapy. By day 90, only two still reported emotional problems and both reported improvement resulting from Product R therapy.

[0066] In addition to the above observations, all patients' blood samples were collected and subjected to standard clinical laboratory tests which are designed for diagnosis and treatment of rheumatoid arthritis and performed routinely by persons of ordinary skill in the art. The results of these tests are summarized in Table I.

1 TABLE I Latex Fixation Rose Ragan Hb (mg/ml) ESR (mm) Test (IU/ml) Test (IU/ml) Patient Day 0 Day 90 Day 0 Day 90 Day 0 Day 90 Day 0 Day 90 1 14.4 14.1 38 26 + 30 + 30 ++ 32 + 8 2 13.6 14.2 32 26 + >40 + 30 >8 + 8 3 14.3 13.8 27 20 ++ 60 + 30 ++ 32 + 8 4 14.0 13.8 29 19 ++ 60 + 30 +++ 128 ++ 32 5 13.6 14.3 32 20 ++ 60 + 30 ++ 32 + 8 6 14.2 13.8 29 18 ++ 60 ++ 60 ++ 32 + 8 7 12.0 13.3 32 19 ++ 60 + 30 +++ 128 + 8 8 14.0 13.8 27 16 + 30 + 30 ++ 32 + 8 9 13.4 14.0 36 22 +++ 120 + 30 ++++ 512 + 8 10 13.8 14.3 29 15 ++ 60 + 30 ++ 32 + 8 11 14.0 13.8 28 19 ++ 60 + 30 ++ 32 + 8 12 13.5 14.3 26 14 ++ 60 + 30 ++ 32 + 8 13 13.6 14.3 34 19 +++ 120 + 30 ++ 32 + 8 14 12.0 13.0 27 17 +++ 120 + 30 +++ 128 + 8 15 11.3 12.7 20 13 + 30 - + 8 + 8 16 13.8 14.4 26 18 ++ 60 + 30 +++ 128 + 8 17 12.7 13.6 27 14 +++ 120 + 30 +++ 128 + 8 18 12.6 13.8 29 18 ++ 60 + 30 +++ 128 + 8 19 13.7 14.8 31 17 + 30 + 30 + 8 + 8 20 13.6 14.2 27 16 + 30 + 30 + 8 + 8 21 12.6 13.9 25 14 +++ 120 + 30 +++ 128 + 8 22 13.4 13.9 31 19 ++ 60 + 30 ++ 32 + 8 23 12.8 14.2 25 14 ++ 60 + 30 +++ 128 + 8 24 14.0 13.7 27 15 +++ 120 + 30 +++ 128 + 8 25 14.4 14.8 22 16 ++ 60 + 30 ++ 32 + 8 26 13.9 14.1 31 19 +++ 120 + 30 +++ 128 ++ 32 27 13.7 14.3 23 17 ++ 60 + 30 ++ 32 + 8

[0067] 20 patients out of 27 had slight increases of hemaglobulin (Hb) values after 90 days of the treatment as compared with pretreatment values. The rest either remained the same or had slight decreases.

[0068] All 27 patients had lower values of erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) on day 90 compared with their corresponding pretreatment values. The average decrease was 10.74 mm with the maximum being 15 mm and the minimum 6 mm.

[0069] All 27 patients had positive latex fixation tests before the treatment. On day 90 after the start of the treatment, of the 27 patients, 22 had decreased values compared with their corresponding pretreatment values. The other five remained the same: one moderately positive (++, 60 IU/ml) and four low positives (+, 30 IU/ml). Only one patient, who had a low positive value to start with (+, 30 IU/ml), became negative to the latex fixation test. The rest, whose values ranged from 30 to 120 IU/ml all became low positives (+, 30 IU/ml).

[0070] All 27 patents had positive Rose Ragan tests before the treatment. None of them became negative but 24 patients showed decreases of the positive values and three remained at the minimum positive value (+, 8 IU/ml) with which they started. 21 patients lowered their values to 8 IU/ml including eight patients who started with high positive values of 128 IU/ml. Three patients lowered their values to 32 IU/ml, two of whom started with 128 IU/ml and one had a very high value of 512 IU/ml before the treatment.

[0071] Thus, while there have been shown and described and pointed out fundamental novel features of the invention as applied to preferred embodiments thereof, it will be understood that various omissions and substitutions and changes in the form and details of the operation illustrated may be made by those skilled in the art without departing from the spirit of the invention. For example, it is expressly intended that all combinations of those elements and/or method steps which perform substantially the same function in substantially the same way to achieve the same results are within the scope of the invention. It is the intention, therefore, to be limited only as indicated by the scope of the claims appended hereto.

[0072] The invention is not limited by the embodiments described above which are presented as examples only but can be modified in various ways within the scope of protection defined by the appended patent claims.

 

* * * * *


[Image]

[Order Copy] Shopping Cart [CURR_LIST]

[Help] [Home] [Boolean Search] [Manual] [Number Search] [PTDLs]

 

 

By: yanks04
22 Sep 2004, 01:14 PM EDT
Msg. 168420 of 170501
(This msg. is a reply to 168407 by buckaroobanzai10.)
Jump to msg. #  
Does Hirschman own it?

 
By: buckaroobanzai10
22 Sep 2004, 01:17 PM EDT
Msg. 168421 of 170501
(This msg. is a reply to 168417 by SUE32073.)
Jump to msg. #  
Sue- I guess then that someone at the company doesn't know how to count. The U.S. patent office website clearly shows only 10 patents. Of course, theoretically, the reason could be that two patents of the 12 were assigned by ADVR to another company. This clerarly did not happen, since there is no indication in any PR or communication that that ever happened.
 
By: SUE32073
22 Sep 2004, 01:22 PM EDT
Msg. 168422 of 170501
(This msg. is a reply to 168419 by lovingitall0.)
Jump to msg. #  
Nice find, lovie. Congratulations.

"Prednisone is co-administered with Product R to the patients orally in a range from about 0.065 to about 1.35 milligram per kilogram of the patient's body weight per day."

- - - - -
View Replies »
 
By: buckaroobanzai10
22 Sep 2004, 01:24 PM EDT
Msg. 168423 of 170501
(This msg. is a reply to 168414 by SUE32073.)
Jump to msg. #  
Sue- There were two patents from IMMAX, Inc with Kochel as inventor,which were awarded to Advanced Viral as part of the settlement of the lawsuit in Michigan. Would these account for the missing two?
- - - - -
 
By: mind31
22 Sep 2004, 01:27 PM EDT
Msg. 168425 of 170501
(This msg. is a reply to 168407 by buckaroobanzai10.)
Jump to msg. #  
buck, this is why I usually do not even get involved in these discussions. I have already posted that the patent application search now only goes back to 2001. The RA patent, I can tell from an old post of mine, was filed in 1999 originally. The only way to access it now would be if someone had the number. I am sure it is still pending.

 
By: SUE32073
22 Sep 2004, 01:27 PM EDT
Msg. 168426 of 170501
(This msg. is a reply to 168423 by buckaroobanzai10.)
Jump to msg. #  
YEPPER.......That would be the logical conclusion (I forgot about them)!!! Thanks.

 
By: buckaroobanzai10
22 Sep 2004, 01:29 PM EDT
Msg. 168427 of 170501
(This msg. is a reply to 168422 by SUE32073.)
Jump to msg. #  
This treatment protocol which includes prednisone seems different from that in the Argentina RA study. Prednisone is a powerful steroidal immunomodulator itself used to suppress the aberrant immune response and cyokine release that characterize the disease -so where does prednisone's effect end, and AVR118's begin?
- - - - -
View Replies »
 
By: nvphyl
22 Sep 2004, 01:36 PM EDT
Msg. 168438 of 170501
(This msg. is a reply to 168412 by yanks04.)
Jump to msg. #  
I never heard the name

Bregman mentioned. I do not know the reason it was believed Reticulose would be able to be sold so soon. As I recall the distributor had to get the drug approved in their geographic location. Perhaps it was felt the FDA could be side stepped in some countries. Who knows?

I knew Gene very well. I knew Hank a little. If those are the Cartwrights you refer to they are definitely not brothers. If you are referring to some others, who? These people were rich, bright, fun, humble and very astute business men. Hank sold one of his companies for $100,000,000.00. If, and that is a big IF, the group feel there are certain rights IMO they will find out. First things first, let's see if 118 becomes commercially viable.

Gene was a sports bettor as I was. He picked the Super Bowl winner like 15 years in a row.

(Voluntary Disclosure: Position- Long)
 
By: buckaroobanzai10
22 Sep 2004, 01:41 PM EDT
Msg. 168442 of 170501
(This msg. is a reply to 168424 by yanks04.)
Jump to msg. #  
yanks- I would hope that over the last eight months Elma has made it Job # 1 to understand the drug and its manufacturing process completely, to research the company's and the drug's (sometimes sordid) past thoroughly,to have reviewed all FDA-related documentation submitted by the company and to begin to correct past deficiencies and missteps. She should be scouring internal company documents daily to be fully informed on the issues.
 
By: mind31
22 Sep 2004, 01:45 PM EDT
Msg. 168443 of 170501
(This msg. is a reply to 168419 by lovingitall0.)
Jump to msg. #  
I knew you could do it luv up.

[0045] A clinical trial to assess the efficacy of Product R in patients suffering from rheumatoid arthritis (RA) has been conducted under a protocol designed by applicant. In this clinical study, twenty-seven female patients ranging in age from 29 to 50 years old, suffering from mild to moderately severe RA for no loner than two years were treated with Product R for a total of 90 days. These patients had been previously treated with Aspirin and/or Paracetamol and/or Arrumalon. Product R was injected subcutaneously at a dose of 1 ml twice per day for 15 days and 1 ml once a day for 75 days. One additional patient, 44 years old, afflicted with severe RA manifested as decrease in articular space, osteopenia and subchondral sclerosis, who was previously treated with gold salts but discontinued due to toxic effects, was injected subcutaneously with Product R at a dose of 2 ml once per day for the first three days followed by 1 ml once per day for 12 months. Two other patients who had suffered from RA for seven and three years respectively where injected subcutaneously with 2 ml of Product R every other day for days, 2 ml every other day for 15 more days and for the next year they were given a maintenance dose of 1 ml a day for 5 consecutive days every 4 months.


 
By: SUE32073
22 Sep 2004, 01:55 PM EDT
Msg. 168449 of 170501
(This msg. is a reply to 168446 by mind31.)
Jump to msg. #  
Mind....if I'm reading this correctly, Prednisone is co-administered with Product R. Wouldn't that indicate all patients received both????

"Specifically, Product R is administered parenterally to the patients in a range from about 2.5 microliter to about 40 microliter per kilogram of the patient's body weight per day in a sterile injectable formulation. Prednisone is co-administered with Product R to the patients orally in a range from about 0.065 to about 1.35 milligram per kilogram of the patient's body weight per day."
 
By: buckaroobanzai10
22 Sep 2004, 02:20 PM EDT
Msg. 168464 of 170501
Jump to msg. #  
There is some discrepancy in the scientific argument for the use of AVR118 in rheumatoid arthritis. Research publications from the company itself have shown that AVR118 increases the levels of the TNF-alpha and IL-8 cytokines. Part of the cytopathology of RA involves the detrimental effects of these cytokines on cartilage. Why then would you use an immunostimulant that enhances the levels of these cytokines in patients who suffer from elevated levels already? Maybe that's why it takes a high dose of co-administered prednisone to counter-effect the actions of AVR118.
 
By: SUE32073
22 Sep 2004, 02:21 PM EDT
Msg. 168465 of 170501
(This msg. is a reply to 168459 by mind31.)
Jump to msg. #  
I hear what you are saying. I'm beginning to wonder if AVR118 can stand alone and prove anything, without the help of "other drugs" as an assist. If AVR118 is used as an anti-inflammatory drug, as in the case of RA, and is also USED and recommended to be used WITH other anti-inflammatory drugs -- (this may sound odd) but isn't there a possibility of patients having an over-reaction to too much of a good thing. When does "over-kill" come into consideration when one authors a patent application of this type. Oh well, I guess we may never find out. AFK-TTL
 
By: lovingitall0
22 Sep 2004, 02:28 PM EDT
Msg. 168469 of 170502
(This msg. is a reply to 168464 by buckaroobanzai10.)
Jump to msg. #  
Well, isn't AVR118 a "switch-type" immunomodulator?

"It can turn on proinflammatory responses of the immune system needed to defend against viral infections or turn off existing aberrant inflammatory reactions, to treat autoimmune diseases."
 
By: buckaroobanzai10
22 Sep 2004, 02:48 PM EDT
Msg. 168472 of 170502
(This msg. is a reply to 168469 by lovingitall0.)
Jump to msg. #  
The "switch-type" immunomodulating effect of AVR118 is a postulated working hypothesis, not yet proven by the company. To demonstrate a "switch-type" effect unambiguously, they would have to show, for example, that the drug acts as a immunostimulant and enhances cytokine production in some cells, say T-lymphocytes; yet is capable of being an immunosuppressive agent, turning the production of the same cytokines off in others, such as cartilage cells or macrophage cells embedded in cartilage. No such study has been done, or published, or presented at a conference, to my knowledge.

- - - - -
 
By: buckaroobanzai10
22 Sep 2004, 03:00 PM EDT
Msg. 168473 of 170502
(This msg. is a reply to 168471 by mind31.)
Jump to msg. #  
mind-Even if the drug could turn on cytokine production in immune cells such as T-lymphocytes, as the company's research has shown, and switch them off in other tisssues, say cartilage, the released cytokines in the circulating blood would invade and flood other tissues and exert their effects there. The cytokine molecules themselves are not "chameleon-like" molecules, that could change their intrinsic properties depending on which area of the body they land. Neither would the peptide molecules in AVR118 change their colors, so to speak, and act differentially, dependent on where they end up in the body.
 
By: buckaroobanzai10
22 Sep 2004, 03:18 PM EDT
Msg. 168477 of 170502
Jump to msg. #  
Cytokine Journal Article Abstract :

1: Cytokine. 2001 May 21;14(4):234-9.

IL-8 and MCP-1 secretion is enhanced by the peptide-nucleic acid immunomodulator, Product R, in U937 cells and primary human monocytes.

Lazzarino DA, de Diego M, Hirschman SZ, Zhang KY, Shaikh S, Musi E, Liaw L, Alexander RJ.

Laboratory of Immunology, Advanced Viral Research Institute, Advanced Viral Research Corp., 200 Corporate Boulevard South, Yonkers, New York 10701, USA.

Product R (Reticulose) is a peptide-nucleic acid immunomodulator recently shown to enhance the expression of mRNAs encoding pro-inflammatory cytokines. Interleukin 8 (IL-8) and macrophage chemoattractant protein-1 (MCP-1) are pro-inflammatory chemokines involved in immune cell mobilization and stimulation. To determine whether Product R acts by upregulating these chemokines, we assayed its effects on the expression of IL-8 and MCP-1 mRNAs and proteins by human monocytic U937 cells and by adherent peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs). U937 cells were cultured for 0-21 days in media containing 0-20% Product R or phosphate-buffered saline (PBS). Compared to control cultures, cells cultured in Product R expressed increased amounts of IL-8 and MCP-1 mRNAs, as measured by reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR). Product R also increased secretion of IL-8 and MCP-1, as measured by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA), and boosted secretion induced by bacterial lipopolysaccharide (LPS), in a time- and dose-dependent manner. In adherent PBMCs, Product R increased IL-8 and MCP-1 secretion, but reduced LPS-induced MCP-1 secretion. While mRNAs encoding the IL-8 receptor, CXCR2, and the MCP-1 receptor, CCR2, were increased in U937 cells cultured in 5-10% Product R, we observed no change in binding of receptor-specific antibodies. These findings suggest that Product R upregulates the expression of IL-8 and MCP-1, which may boost immune system activity in virally-infected patients. Copyright 2001 Academic Press.


 
By: mind31
22 Sep 2004, 03:18 PM EDT
Msg. 168478 of 170503
(This msg. is a reply to 168473 by buckaroobanzai10.)
Jump to msg. #  
buck, if you are saying you are dubious about the switching action well so am I. The results in the Cytokine article were not great and based on a certain type of cell in a dish and tresated cells not infected cells at that.
Recall the the Weizmann rats got better but this was an artificial model of a disease, not the disease itself.
There is a very good argument that rarboston has made that ADVR has functioned as an arcane pure researh company with very little headway towards the reality of bringing a drug to market. I thinlk he has some interesting points but he was hounded off the forum by those that attempt to control debate here.

 
By: mind31
22 Sep 2004, 03:26 PM EDT
Msg. 168480 of 170503
(This msg. is a reply to 168477 by buckaroobanzai10.)
Jump to msg. #  
that's it buck and here is the switch-

"In adherent PBMCs, Product R increased IL-8 and MCP-1 secretion, but reduced LPS-induced MCP-1 secretion."

I know, big whoop! But it is evidence that R/118 increased Il-8 and MCP-1 but reduced MCP-1 in LPS treated cells. Do you follow. Very few here have enough brains to interpret what this says, I think you do.

 
By: buckaroobanzai10
22 Sep 2004, 03:33 PM EDT
Msg. 168484 of 170503
(This msg. is a reply to 168475 by lovingitall0.)
Jump to msg. #  
While AVR118 has been described as an 'antisense' PNA drug in some publications, no publication from the company deals with antisense effects of the drug. "Antisense" refers to the actions of classic synthetic PNAs, which are mimics of short segments of DNA or RNA nucleic acids with a peptide backbone. They bind strongly to the gene-coding segments of DNA (the "sense strand of DNA) in cells and thus prevent the effects of the gene's activation. They block the actions of the DNA sense-strand, and therefore are called 'anti-sense'. The patent on AVR118 chemical structure identifying the ingredients reveals that the drug has two main peptides. One is a normal peptide. The other is a peptide attached to a very short RNA fragment. So, it can very loosely be called a peptide-nucleic acid (PNA), but in no way is it sructurally to functionally to the synthetic PNAs that other companies and researchers are working on.

 
By: lovingitall0
22 Sep 2004, 03:47 PM EDT
Msg. 168486 of 170503
(This msg. is a reply to 168484 by buckaroobanzai10.)
Jump to msg. #  
Thank you!

"The in vitro findings reveal that Reticulose significantly inhibits the replication of HIV in cell culture systems. Most important, Reticulose stimulates the immune system to produce a distinctive set of substances called chemokines (cytokines). Reticulose belongs to a recently discovered group of chemical structures called peptide nucleic acids (PNAs). PNAs are newly appreciated molecules consisting of both amino acids and nucleic acids (part protein and part gene) that already have been shown to have interesting properties; for example, they are very stable and have anti-sense activity. Reticulose, a non-toxic PNA......"

http://www.aegis.com/news/pr/1996/PR960827.html

 
By: mind31
22 Sep 2004, 03:53 PM EDT
Msg. 168487 of 170503
(This msg. is a reply to 168484 by buckaroobanzai10.)
Jump to msg. #  
buck, I believe the RNA fragment peptide is also quite balled up and convoluted and likely incapable of interaction with DNA. IMO this is not a true PNA nor an antisense drug. They have gone to calling it a co-polymer which might be closer to the truth but is meant to draw association to Copaxone which it ain't. Every thing this damn company does is squirrely if you ask me. I don't like 'em. All IMO only.

 
By: buckaroobanzai10
22 Sep 2004, 04:05 PM EDT
Msg. 168490 of 170503
(This msg. is a reply to 168487 by mind31.)
Jump to msg. #  
mind, I concur with you. The RNA fragment is only two nucleotide units long and would not stick out from the peptide backbone enough to interact with DNA at all. It should not have been called a PNA -the use of the term is misleading, because the compound is NOT a conventional PNA. The more correct term would be "nucleopeptide" or "dinucleotide-conjugated peptide".

 
By: mind31
22 Sep 2004, 04:18 PM EDT
Msg. 168491 of 170503
(This msg. is a reply to 168490 by buckaroobanzai10.)
Jump to msg. #  
What I call Taraporewala's patent describes the two peptides in great detail and peptide B is clearly labeled like you say as a peptide-nucleic acid conjugate. Further peptide B is the primary component that accounts for most of 118 biological activity although peptide A does account for something as apparently does a third as yet unidentified peptide.
It does not look like a PNA to me. Looks more like soup to me which is what I have called it here for years. Gee buck, you are smart! Your first name would not be Irach would it?

 
By: mind31
22 Sep 2004, 04:22 PM EDT
Msg. 168492 of 170503
(This msg. is a reply to 168490 by buckaroobanzai10.)
Jump to msg. #  
But I correct myself, it is Peptide A that is all balled up. Peptide B as you say simply has a short fragment sort of like Allen's Jones.
 
By: lovingitall0
22 Sep 2004, 04:44 PM EDT
Msg. 168498 of 170503
(This msg. is a reply to 168495 by mind31.)
Jump to msg. #  
Anti-Cachectic Effects of a Novel Peptide Nucleic Acid Complex:

By: fenderbender60
06 Jun 2004, 04:03 PM EDT
Msg. 156057 of 168496

ADVR Presented Results of its AVR118 Phase 1/2 Clinical Program at ASCO

via COMTEX

June 6, 2004

YONKERS, N.Y., Jun 6, 2004 /PRNewswire-FirstCall via COMTEX/ --

Advanced Viral Research Corp. (OTC Bulletin Board: ADVR) announced today that the company presented interim results of its Phase 1/2 clinical program with its flagship product, AVR118, at The American Society of Clinical Oncology's (ASCO) 40th Annual Meeting in New Orleans, LA.

The presentation 'Anti-Cachectic Effects of a Novel Peptide Nucleic Acid Complex: Preliminary Results of a Phase1/2 Clinical Trial,'given by James T. D'Olimpio M.D, showed the results of Phase 1/2 clinical trials conducted in Israel. A total of 25 cachectic patients (patients with cancer cachexia or AIDS wasting) were enrolled in the trials. Ten patients with advanced AIDS and two patients with advanced pancreatic cancer received AVR118 subcutaneously at a dose of 0.4 ml/day for 28 days (6 days/week). Eight AIDS patients received a dose of 2.0 ml/day and five patients received 4.0 ml/day at the same schedule.

All patients were followed for 28 days after treatment was completed. Total weight, body mass index (BMI), fat percentage, strength, calf and arm circumference, and skin fold were measured for all AIDS patients. Spontaneous patient comments regarding quality of life (QOL) parameters, including improvement in mood, appetite, alertness, activities of daily living (ADLs), malaise, myalgia and power/energy were recorded. Adverse events were monitored.

All dose groups showed an increase in weight, strength and fat percentage, with more significant improvements in the two higher dose levels. All patients with anorexia at entry became anorexia-free after three weeks of therapy. Spontaneous patient comments reflect widespread, dose-related improvements in Quality of Life (QOL). AVR118 continues to show a favorable safety profile.

'This trial was designed as a dose-escalation study and we are pleasantly surprised to see such strong data given the relatively short treatment period,'said Dr. Elma Hawkins, President and CEO of Advanced Viral Research Corp. 'We are very encouraged by the results, most importantly with the resolution of anorexia in all study participants.'

Results Reported - AIDS: 0.4 ml dose * All patients were anorexia-free after three weeks of treatment. (One patient did not have anorexia at baseline). * Half of the patients reported increased daily activity. 2 ml dose * All patients were anorexia-free after three weeks of treatment. * At the end of four weeks of treatment the average weight of patients increased by over a pound. * All patients had an increase of fat percentage after treatment and this was sustained in the majority of patients. * Approximately half of the patients reported an improvement in their mood and increased daily activities. 4 ml dose * All patients were anorexia free after three weeks of treatment. It is important to note that 50 percent of patients had Grade Two anorexia at baseline. * Patients in this cohort increased their average weight by 2.2 pounds over four weeks of treatment. This effect continued through the following four weeks at which point the average weight had increased by 2.6 pounds over baseline. * All patients showed an increase in fat percentage which was sustained after treatment discontinuation in all patients. * 100 percent of patients reported an increase in daily activity. * 80 percent of patients reported decreased fatigue. Results Reported - Pancreatic Cancer: * Both patients had improved weight (4% increase) * Improved fat percentage (20% increase) * Improved strength (5 % increase)
ADVR's AVR118 represents a biopolymer that possesses novel immunomodulator activity. This peptide-nucleic acid complex, which to date has demonstrated a very favorable safety profile, appears to stimulate the proinflammatory responses required to combat viral infections such as AIDS and human papillomavirus and to dampen aberrant autoimmune-type inflammatory responses, such as occur in patients with rheumatoid arthritis. AVR118 is in clinical trials in Israel for the treatment of cachexia (body wasting) in patients with AIDS.

For further information regarding Advanced Viral Research Corp., please visit our website at http://www.adviral.com. Advanced Viral Research Corp., based in Yonkers, New York, is a biopharmaceutical firm dedicated to improving patients'lives by researching, developing and bringing to market new and effective therapies for viral and other diseases.

Note: This news release contains forward-looking statements that involve risks associated with clinical development, regulatory approvals, including application to the FDA, product commercialization and other risks described from time to time in the SEC reports filed by the Company. AVR118 (Product R) is not approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration or any comparable agencies of any other countries. There is no assurance that the Company will be able to secure the financing necessary to continue and/or complete the clinical trials of AVR118 or satisfy certain other conditions relating to clinical trials including obtaining adequate insurance on terms acceptable to the Company or that if completed, clinical trials performed outside the United States will assist the Company in obtaining FDA or other regulatory approval. The Company undertakes no obligation to update or revise the

information contained in this announcement whether as a result of new information, future events or circumstances or otherwise.

Contact: Ronnie Welch or Kelly Cinelli CWR &Partners 508/222-4802

SOURCE Advanced Viral Research Corp.

Ronnie Welch or Kelly Cinelli, both of CWR &Partners, +1-508-222-4802 /Company News On-Call: http://www.prnewswire.com/comp/903002.html

http://www.adviral.com

 
By: mind31
22 Sep 2004, 04:44 PM EDT
Msg. 168499 of 170503
(This msg. is a reply to 157635 by buckaroobanzai10.)
Jump to msg. #  
Worth repeating

By: buckaroobanzai10
16 Jun 2004, 09:23 AM EDT
Msg. 157635 of 168496
Jump to msg. #
AVR118’s a remarkable drug
Treats infections by many a known bug
It fattens the cachectic
Helps the apopleptic
And wipes wrinkles right off your mug

AVR118, it is said
Is quite a wonderful med
If what I heard is true
You can treat celiac sprue
And basal carcinomas on a forehead

AVR118, there’s no doubt
Is probably good for your gout
A couple of doses
Cures runny noses
And also cold sores on your mouth

AVR118 sure sounds like snake oil
But many a disease it will foil
Use it for colitis,
Inflammed cellulitis-
It works wonders applied to a boil

AVR118- it’s just great!
Grows new hair on your bald pate
It’s superb for the flu
For blood glucose too
And helps skinny people gain weight

AVR118 - a.k.a Bregman’s Brew
Is there no end to what it can do?
From warts and scabies
Herpes simplex and rabies,
Arthritis and multiple sclerosis too!

AVR118’s a wonderful lotion
I believe, I do have a notion
It cured my doggy’s distemper
And controls my bad temper
And you can use it to quell a loose motion

AVR118- that peptide-filled goop
Can just put an end to the croup
It treats every condition
Of immune dysfunction
It’s better than Mom’s chicken soup!

And no matter who’s doing the talkin’
Whether Hirschman or Eli or Hawkin’
We’re told, “Just you wait’
This drug is just great!
This ain’t no snake oil that we’re hawkin’ “

“Wonder Drug” is a term I could bandy
But where’s the elusive new IND
ADVR stock’s one off which
I thought I’d get rich-
I’d sure like to shop Prada and Fendi !