yanks A group I rub elbows with in Vegas in 1996 were very interested in ADVR. The distributor thing was topic A. If there is every any commercial success attached to 118 I don't think we have heard the last of them. I am not a lawyer and could be all wet on the subject. However, that was a long time ago and I have since moved back to Michigan and lost contact. Things may have changed. I do know they expected the drug would be marketable by the end of '96. That is the reason I can post that I am (Voluntary Disclosure: Position- Long) |
Maybe it's hidden in Australia???
Or, maybe the dingo ate it!!...LOL From the last 10-K -- PATENTS Patent protection and trade secret protection are important to our business and our future will depend, in part, on our ability to maintain trade secret protection, obtain patents and operate without infringing the proprietary rights of others both in the United States and abroad. We have 12 issued U.S. patents, some covering the composition of AVR118 and others covering various uses of AVR118. We have eight pending U.S. patent applications and 18 pending foreign patent applications. In addition, we have two issued Australian patents and one issued Chinese patent covering several uses of AVR118. During April 2002, under the terms of a settlement agreement entered as part of a final judgment on March 25, 2002, we were assigned all rights, title and interest in two issued U.S. patents pertaining to Reticulose technology. As patent applications in the United States are maintained in secrecy until published or patents issue and as publication of discoveries in the scientific or patent literature often lag behind the actual discoveries, we cannot be certain that we were the first to make the inventions covered by each of our pending patent applications or that we were the first to file patent applications for such inventions. Furthermore, the patent positions of biotechnology and pharmaceutical companies are highly uncertain and involve complex legal and factual questions, and, therefore, the breadth of claims allowed in biotechnology and pharmaceutical patents or their enforceability cannot be predicted. We cannot be sure that any additional patents will issue from any of our patent applications or, should any patents issue, that we will be provided with adequate protection against potentially competitive products. Furthermore, we cannot be sure that any patents will be of commercial value to us, or that private parties, including competitors, will not successfully challenge our patents or circumvent our patent position in the United States or abroad. In the absence of adequate patent protection, our business may be adversely affected by competitors who develop comparable technology or products. Moreover, pursuant to the terms of the Uruguay Round Agreements Act, patents filed on or after June 8, 1995 have a term of 20 years from the date of such filing, irrespective of the period of time it may take for such patent to ultimately issue. This may shorten the period of patent protection afforded to our products as patent applications in the biopharmaceutical sector often take considerable time to issue. Under the Drug Price Competition and Patent Term Restoration Act of 1984 (the "Patent Act"), a sponsor may obtain marketing exclusivity for a period of time following FDA approval of certain drug applications, regardless of patent status, if the drug is a new chemical entity or if new clinical studies were used to support the marketing application for the drug. Pursuant to the FDA Modernization Act of 1997, the period of exclusivity can be extended if the applicant performs certain studies in pediatric patients. This marketing exclusivity prevents a third party from obtaining FDA approval for a similar or identical drug under an Abbreviated New Drug Application ("ANDA") or a "505(b)(2)" New Drug Application. The statute also allows a patent owner to obtain an extension of applicable patent terms for a period equal to one-half the period of time elapsed between the filing of an IND and the filing of the corresponding NDA plus the period of time between the filing of the NDA and FDA approval, with a five year maximum patent extension. We cannot be sure that we will be able to take advantage of either the patent term extension or marketing exclusivity provisions of this law. In order to protect the confidentiality of our technology, including trade secrets and know-how and other proprietary technical and business information, we require all of our employees, consultants, advisors and collaborators to enter into confidentiality agreements that prohibit the use or disclosure of information that is deemed confidential. The agreements also oblige our employees, consultants, advisors and collaborators to assign to us developments, discoveries and inventions made by such persons in connection with their work with us. We cannot be sure that confidentiality will be maintained or disclosure prevented by these agreements or that our proprietary information or intellectual property will be protected thereby or that others will not independently develop substantially equivalent proprietary information or intellectual property. The pharmaceutical industry is highly competitive and patents have been applied for by, and issued to, other parties relating to products competitive with AVR118. Therefore, AVR118 and any other drug candidates may give rise to claims that they infringe the patents or proprietary rights of other parties existing now and in the future. Furthermore, to the extent that we or our consultants or research collaborators use intellectual property owned by others in work performed for us, disputes may also arise as to the rights in such intellectual property or in related or resulting know-how and inventions. An adverse claim could subject us to significant liabilities to such other parties and/or require disputed rights to be licensed from such other parties. We cannot be sure that any license required under any such patents or proprietary rights would be made available on terms acceptable to us, if at all. If we do not obtain such licenses, we may encounter delays in product market introductions, or may find that the development, manufacture or sale of products requiring such licenses may be precluded. In addition, we could incur substantial costs in defending ourselves in legal proceedings instituted before the PTO or in a suit brought against it by a private party based on such patents or proprietary rights, or in suits by us asserting our patent or proprietary rights against another party, even if the outcome is not adverse to us. There are extensions available under the Patent Act if the delay in prosecution of the patent application results from a delay in the PTO's handling of any interference or appeal involving the application. We have not conducted any searches or made any independent investigations of the existence of any patents or proprietary rights of other parties. |
Uh oh, the SEC document states 12
issued Patents; I only found 10. Anyone else know what the other two (2)
Patents are: PAT. NO. Title 6,696,422 Combination therapy for HIV infections 6,670,118 Method for treating papillomavirus infections 6,528,098 Preparation of a therapeutic composition 6,440,658 Assay method for determining Product R's effect on adenovirus infection of Hela cells 6,355,226 Topical treatment of skin disease and eye afflictions 6,303,153 Preparation of a therapeutic composition 6,268,349 Method for treating B19 parvovirus infections 5,849,196 Composition containing peptides and nucleic acids and methods of making same 5,807,840 Method for treating canine distemper 5,807,839 Method for stimulating red blood cell production |
The other two patents may refer to
issued patents in other countries. |
Wouldn't your theory then make the
number 13. Remember, we talking U.S. Patents issued. "We have 12 issued U.S. patents, some covering the composition of AVR118 and others covering various uses of AVR118. We have eight pending U.S. patent applications and 18 pending foreign patent applications. In addition, we have two issued Australian patents and one issued Chinese patent covering several uses of AVR118." |
A method of ameliorating a symptom
of rheumatoid arthritis in a patient suffering from rheumatoid arthritis,
http://appft1.uspto.gov/netacgi/nph-Parser?Sect1=PTO2&Sect2=HITOFF&p=1&u=%2Fnetahtml%2FPTO%2Fsearch-adv.html&r=1&f=G&l=50&d=PG01&S1=20020013284.PGNR.&OS=DN/20020013284&RS=DN/20020013284 |
( 1 of 1 ) |
United States Patent Application | 20020013284 |
Kind Code | A1 |
HIRSCHMAN, SHALOM Z. | January 31, 2002 |
METHOD FOR TREATING AUTOIMMUNE DISEASES
Abstract
A method of treating patients having rheumatoid arthritis by administering Product R, a peptide-nucleic acid preparation, is disclosed.
Inventors: | HIRSCHMAN, SHALOM Z.; (RIVERDALE, NY) |
Correspondence Name and Address: |
MYRON COHEN ESQ COHEN PONTANI LIEBERMAN & PAVANE 551 FIFTH AVENUE SUITE 1210 NEW YORK NY 10176 |
Serial No.: | 316624 |
Series Code: | 09 |
Filed: | May 21, 1999 |
U.S. Current Class: | 514/44; 514/2 |
U.S. Class at Publication: | 514/44; 514/2 |
Intern'l Class: | A01N 043/04; A01N 037/18 |
Claims
I claim:
1. A method of ameliorating a symptom of rheumatoid arthritis in a patient
suffering from rheumatoid arthritis, comprising parenterally administering to
said patient an effective symptom ameliorating amount of product R in a range
from about 2.5 microliter to about 40 microliters per kilogram of body weight
per day in a pharmaceutically acceptable formulation.
2. The method of claim 1 wherein said Product R is administered in a range from
about 5 microliters to about 25 microliters per kilogram of body weight per day.
3. The method of claim 1 wherein said Product R is administered in amount of
about 7.5 microliters per kilogram of body weight per day.
4. A method of ameliorating a symptom of rheumatoid arthritis in a patient
suffering from rheumatoid arthritis, comprising the steps of: a. parenterally
administering Product R to said patient an effective symptom ameliorating amount
of about 1 ml twice per day in a pharmaceutically acceptable formulation for
about 15 days; and b. Parenterally administering Product R to said patient an
effective symptom ameliorating amount of about 1 ml once per day in a
pharmaceutically acceptable formulation for about 75 days after step a.
Description
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
[0001] 1. Field of the Invention
[0002] The present invention relates to a method for using Product R as
hereinafter defined to treat patients having rheumatoid arthritis.
[0003] 2. Description of the Related Art
[0004] Autoimmune diseases in mammals can generally be classified in one of two
different categories: cell-mediated disease (i.e. T-cell) or antibody-mediated
disorders. Non-limiting examples of cell-mediated autoimmune diseases include
multiple sclerosis, rheumatoid arthritis, autoimmune thyroiditis, diabetes
mellitus (Juvenile onset diabetes) and autoimmune uveoretinitis.
Antibody-mediated autoimmune disorders include myasthenia gravis and systemic
lupus erythematosus (or SLE).
[0005] Diseases with autoimmune features affect well over 5 percent of
individuals at some time in their life. A large group of disparate autoimmune
diseases are characterized by an often intense, sustained and injurious immune
response apparently directed to a self-antigen. Autoimmunity is not a
generalized state, but rather each disease reflects a highly specific pattern of
recognition of different self structures and likely reflects equally distinct
immune recognition events. These disorders vary from relatively mild conditions
to those that virulently attack critical cells and organs of the body.
[0006] Autoimmune diseases may be classified as organ specific or non-orgain
specific depending on whether the response is primarily against either antigens
localized to particular organs or widespread antigens. In organ specific
diseases typified by Hashimoto's thyroiditis, lesions are restricted because the
antigen in the organ acts as a target for immunological attack. In non-organ
specific disease typified by systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE), complexes
formed with the antigens involved are deposited systemically, particularly in
the kidney, joints and skin, so giving rise to the more diseminated features of
the disease.
[0007] Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) is an inflammatory, multisystem
disease characterized clinically as a relapsing disease of acute or insidious
onset that may involve any organ in the body. Clinically, symptoms are due to
disease affecting the skin, kidneys, serosal membranes, joints and heart.
Anatomically, all sites have in common vascular lesions with fibrinoid deposits
and immunologically, the disease involves antibodies of autoimmune origin,
especially antinuclear antibodies (ANA). The ANA are directed against both DNA
and RNA. Autoantibody development appears to be multifactorial in origin,
involving genetic, hormonal, immunologic and environmental factors.
[0008] Rheumatoid arthritis is a systemic, chronic, inflammatory disease that
affects principally the joints and sometimes many other organs and tissues
throughout the body. The disease is characterized by a nonsuppurative
proliferative synovitis, which in time leads to the destruction of articular
cartilage and progressive disabling arthritis. The disease is caused by
persistent and self-perpetuating inflammation resulting from immunologic
processes taking place in the joints. As is the case with most autoimmune
diseases, the trigger that initiates the immune reaction remains unidentified.
Both humoral and cell mediated immune responses are involved in the pathogenesis
of rheumatoid arthritis. The majority of patients have elevated levels of serum
immunoglobulins and essentially all patients have an antibody called rheumatoid
factor (RF) directed against a component of another antibody class.
[0009] Multiple sclerosis is another disease that is thought to be caused by
autoimmune mechanisms. The cause of multiple sclerosis is unknown but seems to
be multifactorial. Susceptibility or resistance may be genetically determined;
something in the environment interacts with the human host at the proper age to
cause biochemical and structural lesions in the central nervous system. The
systemic immune response and the response of the central nervous system become
involved. Although the cause and pathogenesis of multiple sclerosis are unknown,
it is widely believed that immune abnormalities are somehow related to the
disease. Three possible mechanisms have been postulated: infection,
autoimmunity, and a combination of the two. Suppression or modulation of the
immune responses may be the key.
[0010] Myasthenia gravis is an autoimmune disorder caused by antibodies directed
against the acetylcholine receptor of skeletal muscle. Present information
indicates at least three mechanisms whereby acetylcholine receptor antibody may
interfere with neuromuscular transmission and thus induce myasthenia gravis.
Acetylcholine receptor antibody may interfere (directly or indirectly) with
acetylcholine receptor function. In both experimental allergic myasthenia gravis
and human myasthenia gravis, the extent of acetylcholine receptor loss parallels
the clinical severity of the disease, suggesting that acetylcholine receptor
antibody-induced acceleration of acetylcholine receptor degradation is important
in the development of myasthenia gravis. Complement-mediated destruction of the
postsynaptic region is the third possible cause. Other disorders, especially
those presumed to be autoimmune in origin, can occur in association with
myasthenia gravis. Thyroid disease, rheumatoid arthritis, systemic lupus
erythematosus, and pernicious anemia all occur more commonly with myasthenia
gravis than would be expected by chance.
[0011] Implication of viruses in autoimmunity has been supported by findings
that autoimmune responses are induced, accelerate or enhanced concomitant with
infection by a wide variety of human DNA and RNA viruses. Using an investigative
approach that focuses on one potential mechanism where microbes cause
autoimmunity, or molecular mimicry, a number of etiologic agents have been
identified as potential causes of autoimmune disease.
[0012] Certain viruses have a mitogenic effect on unique lymphocyte subsets and
hence act as polyclonal activators. Viruses can also infect lymphocytes and
macrophage and directly or through their proteins cause release of lymphokines
and manikines. These molecules can modulate immune responses in a variety of
ways, including as growth or differentiation factors or by regulating MHC class
I and/or class II expression on cells. Finally, microbial agents share
determinants with host self proteins. In this instance, an immune response
mounted by the host against a specific determinant of the infecting agent may
cross-react with the mimic (shared) host sequence, leading to autoimmunity and,
in some cases, tissue injury and disease.
[0013] The current treatments for both categories of autoimmune diseases involve
administration of drugs which non-specifically suppress the immune response.
Examples of such drugs are methotrexate, cyclophosphamide, Imuran (azathioprine)
and cyclosporin A., steroid compounds such as prednisone and methylprednisilone
are also employed in many instances. These drugs have limited efficacy against
both cell- and antibody-mediated autoimmune diseases. Use of such drugs is
limited by virtue of their toxic side effects and also because they induce
"global" immunosuppression in a patient receiving prolonged treatment with the
drug, e.g. the normal protective immune response to pathogenic microorganisms is
downregulated thereby increasing the risk of infections caused by these
pathogens. A further drawback is that there is an increased risk that
malignancies will develop in patients receiving prolonged global
immunosuppression.
[0014] Reticulose.sup.1 emerged as an antiviral product in the 1930's. While it
was originally believed to be a product composed of peptone, peptides and
nucleic acids, the precise composition remains unidentified. Nevertheless,
Reticulose has demonstrated an ability to inhibit rapidly the course of several
viral diseases. It is nontoxic, miscible with tissue fluids and blood sera and
free from anaphylactogenic properties. Product R is a refinement of Reticulose
prepared by an improved manufacturing process. It is a peptide nucleic acid
preparation with defined composition. .sup.1 The agent was known under the
trademark "Reticulose", a trademark of Advance Viral Research.
[0015] Insofar as the applicant knows, Product R has never been used, nor
suggested for treating autoimmune diseases.
SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
[0016] An object of this invention therefore is to provide a method for treating
a patient having autoimmune diseases by administering parenterally an effective
treatment amount of Product R, a peptide-nucleic acid preparation, to the
patient.
[0017] Product R is particularly useful in treating patients identified as
having autoimmune disease rheumatoid arthritis.
[0018] Specifically, Product R is administered parenterally to the patients in a
range from about 2.5 microliter to about 40 microliter per kilogram of the
patient's body weight per day in a sterile injectable formulation. Prednisone is
co-administered with Product R to the patients orally in a range from about
0.065 to about 1.35 milligram per kilogram of the patient's body weight per day.
[0019] Other objects and features of the present invention will become apparent
from the following detailed description considered in conjunction with the
accompanying drawings. It is to be understood, however, that the drawings are
designed solely for purposes of illustration and not as a definition of the
limits of the invention, for which reference should be made to the appended
claims.
[0020] The various features of novelty which characterize the invention are
pointed out with particularity in the claims annexed to and forming a part of
the disclosure. For a better understanding of the invention, its operating
advantages, and specific objects attained by its use, reference should be had to
the drawing and descriptive matter in which there are illustrated and described
preferred embodiments of the invention.
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
[0021] In the drawings:
[0022] FIG. 1A shows the reduction of spontaneous pain resulting from the
treatment with Product R.
[0023] FIG. 1B shows the reduction of the applied pressure pain resulting from
the treatment with Product R.
[0024] FIG. 1C shows the reduction of the movement pain resulting from the
treatment with Product R.
[0025] FIG. 2 shows the reduction of tumefaction of soft tissues resulting from
the treatment with Product R.
[0026] FIG. 3 shows the reduction of morning stiffness resulting from Product R
treatment.
[0027] FIG. 4 shows the mobility of the most affected joints before and after
the treatment with Product R.
[0028] FIG. 5 shows the improvements of various activities that were hindered by
rheumatoid arthritis.
DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE PRESENTLY PREFERRED EMBODIMENTS
[0029] As used herein, Product R is the product produced according to either of
the following methods.
Method I For Preparing Product R
[0030] Suspend about 35.0 g of casein, about 17.1 g of beef peptone, about 22.0
g of nucleic acid (RNA), about 3.25 g bovine serum albumin in about 2.5 liters
of water for injection USP at about 3 to 7.degree. C. in a suitable container
and gently stir until all the ingredients have been properly wet. Carefully add
while stirring about 16.5 g of sodium hydroxide (reagent grade ACS) and continue
stirring until sodium hydroxide completely dissolved. Autoclave at about 9 lbs
pressure and 200-230.degree. F. for a period of time until RNA is completely
digested, for example, about 4 hours. At the end of the period, the autoclave is
stopped and the reaction flask and contents are permitted to slowly cool to
ambient temperature. Then cool for at least six hours at about 3-8.degree. C.
The resulting solution is filtered through 2 micron and 0.45 micron filters
using inert gas such as nitrogen or argon at low pressure (1-6 psi). In a
similar manner the solution is filtered again through 0.2 micron pyrogen
retention filters. The resulting filtrate is sampled and assayed for total
nitrogen. A calculation is then performed to determine the quantity of cooled
water for injection to be added to the filtrate to yield a diluted filtrate with
a nitrogen content between about 165-210 mg/ml, the final volume is
approximately 5 liters. The pH is then adjusted with either concentrated HCl
(reagent grade ACS) or 1.0 normal NaOH to about 7.3-7.6 range. The diluted
solution is then filtered again through 0.2 micron filters with inert gas at low
pressure. The final filtrate is then filled and sealed into 2 ml glass ampules
while in an inert gas atmosphere. The ampules are collected and autoclave for
final sterilization at 240.degree. F. and 20 to 30 pounds pressure for about 30
minutes. Following the sterilization cycle, the ampules with Product R are
cooled and washed.
[0031] All quantities are subject to plus or minus 2.5% variation for pH,
volume, and analytical adjustments.
Method II For Preparing Product R
[0032] Suspend about 35.0 g of casein, about 17.1 g of beef peptone, about 22.0
g of nucleic acid (RNA), about 3.25 g bovine serum albumin in about 2.5 liters
of water for injection USP at about 3 to 7.degree. C. in a suitable container
and gently stir until all the ingredients have been properly wet. Slowly add
while stirring about 11.75 ml of hydrochloric acid (reagent grade ACS) and
continue stirring until hydrochloric acid is completely dissolved. Autoclave at
about 9 lbs pressure and 200- 230.degree. F. for a period of time until RNA is
completely digested, for example, about 4 hours. At the end of the period, the
autoclave is stopped and the reaction flask and contents are permitted to slowly
cool to ambient temperature. Then cool for at least six hours at about
3-8.degree. C. The resulting solution is filtered through 2 micron and 0.45
micron filters using inert gas such as nitrogen or argon at low pressure (1-6
psi). In a similar manner the solution is filtered again through 0.2 micron
pyrogen retention filters. The resulting filtrate is sampled and assayed for
total nitrogen. A calculation is then performed to determine the quantity of
cooled water for injection to be added to the filtrate to yield a diluted
filtrate with a nitrogen content between about 165-210 mg/ml, the final volume
is approximately 5 liters. The ph is then adjusted with either concentrated HCL
(reagent grade ACS) or 35% (w/v) of NaOH to about 7.3-7.6 range. The diluted
solution is then filtered again through 0.2 micr on filters with inert gas at
low pressure. The final filtrate is then filled and sealed into 2 ml glass
ampules while in an inert gas atmosphere. The ampules are collected and
autoclave for final sterilization at 240.degree. F. and 20 to 30 pounds pressure
for about 30 minutes. Following the sterilization cycle, the ampules with
Product R are cooled and washed.
[0033] All quantities are subject to plus or minus 2.5% variation for pH,
volume, and analytical adjustments.
[0034] Product R may administered alone or together with an autoimmune disease
treatment agent. When administered to the patients, Product R may be applied
parenterally, the autoimmune disease treatment agent, e.g. prednisone may be
administered orally. The combination of Product R and prednisone may be applied
either simultaneously or in alternation.
[0035] For the above autoimmune diseases, a suitable effective dose of Product R
is in the range from about 2.5 microliter to about 40 microliter per kilogram of
body weight per day, preferably in the range of about 5 microliter to about 25
microliter per kilogram of body weight per day. Most preferably Product R is
administered in an amount of about 7.5 microliter per kilogram of body weight
per day. The desired dose may be administered as two, three or more sub-doses at
appropriate intervals, generally equally spread in time, throughout the day.
Preferably, however, the full daily dose is administered in one administration.
[0036] Product R may be administered by any suitable injection route including,
but not limited to intravenously, intraperitoneal, subcutaneously,
intramuscularly, and intradermally, etc. The presently preferred route of
administration is intramuscularly. It will be appreciated that the preferred
route may vary with, for example, the condition and age of the recipient.
[0037] While it is possible for Product R to be administered as part of a
pharmaceutical formulation, it is preferable to present it alone, although it
may be administered at about the same time as one or more other pharmaceuticals
are independently administered. If Product R is administered as part of a
pharmaceutical formulation, the formulations of the present invention comprise
at least one administered ingredient, as above defined, together with one or
more acceptable carriers thereof and optionally other therapeutic ingredients.
The carrier(s) must be "acceptable" in the sense of being compatible with the
other ingredients of the formulation and not deleterious to the recipient
thereof. Preferably, Product R constitutes at least about 90% of such
formulation by.
[0038] The formulations may conveniently be presented in unit-dose or multi-dose
containers, e.g. sealed ampules and vials.
[0039] Preferred unit dosage formulations are those containing a daily dose or
unit, daily sub-dose, or an appropriate fraction of the administered ingredient.
[0040] Prednisone is co-administered with Product R to provide a combined
therapy in treating autoimmune diseases. While it is possible for the active
ingredients of prednisone to be administered alone, it is preferable to present
them as pharmaceutical formulations. The formulations comprise at least one
active ingredient, together with one or more acceptable carriers therefore and
optionally other therapeutic ingredients. The carrier(s) must be "acceptable" in
the sense of being compatible with the other ingredients of the formulation and
not deleterious to the patient thereof.
[0041] The formulations for prednisone includes those suitable for oral
administration.
[0042] The formulations may conveniently be presented in unit dosage form and
may be prepared by any of the methods well known in the art of pharmacy. Such
methods include the step of bringing into association the active ingredient with
the carrier which constitutes one or more accessory ingredients. In general, the
formulations are prepared by uniformly and intimately bringing into association
the active ingredient with liquid carriers of finely divided solid carriers or
both, and then, if necessary, shaping the products.
[0043] For oral administration, prednisone is calculated as the free base of
about 0.065 to 1.35 milligram per kilogram, preferably 0.25 to 0.8 milligram per
kilogram, of the patient's body weight per day, and is preferably used in a unit
dosage form, and administered a few times daily in the amount of 1 to 50
milligram per unit dose. Dosage of prednisone should be individualized according
to the severity of the disease and the response of the patient.
[0044] It should be understood that Product R may also be co-administered with
other anti-autoimmune disease agents such as methotrexate, cyclophosphamide,
imuran and cyclosporin A, etc. The dose of other anti-autoimmune disease agents
to be co-administered with Product R can be readily determined by those skilled
in the art, based on the usual patient symptoms, and severity of the diseases.
[0045] A clinical trial to assess the efficacy of Product R in patients
suffering from rheumatoid arthritis (RA) has been conducted under a protocol
designed by applicant. In this clinical study, twenty-seven female patients
ranging in age from 29 to 50 years old, suffering from mild to moderately severe
RA for no loner than two years were treated with Product R for a total of 90
days. These patients had been previously treated with Aspirin and/or Paracetamol
and/or Arrumalon. Product R was injected subcutaneously at a dose of 1 ml twice
per day for 15 days and 1 ml once a day for 75 days. One additional patient, 44
years old, afflicted with severe RA manifested as decrease in articular space,
osteopenia and subchondral sclerosis, who was previously treated with gold salts
but discontinued due to toxic effects, was injected subcutaneously with Product
R at a dose of 2 ml once per day for the first three days followed by 1 ml once
per day for 12 months. Two other patients who had suffered from RA for seven and
three years respectively where injected subcutaneously with 2 ml of Product R
every other day for days, 2 ml every other day for 15 more days and for the next
year they were given a maintenance dose of 1 ml a day for 5 consecutive days
every 4 months.
[0046] No major or minor side effects were observed or reported. Only one
patient reported, on day 90, a mild reaction at the site of injection that
lasted two days and resolved by itself.
[0047] The improvement of rheumatoid arthritis were determined according to
measurements such as pain, tumefaction of soft tissues, morning stiffness,
mobility of the most affected joint, the size of the most affected joint and
some laboratory tests.
[0048] FIG. 1A shows the reduction of spontaneous pain resulted from the
treatment with Product R. Prior to the treatment, of twenty-seven patients,
seven reported no pain, eight reported slight pain, and twelve reported
moderated pain, which are represented by the shaded bars. By day thirty of the
treatment, five patients reported moderate pain and twelve patients reported
slight pain. By day sixty, eleven patients had slight pain. By day ninety, only
5 patients still reported slight pain. The severe RA patient was monitored on
days 0, 15, 30 and 45 of the treatment. By day 45, she still experienced
moderate spontaneous pain.
[0049] FIG. 1B shows the reduction of the pain produced by applied pressure. All
twenty eight patients including the severe RA patient reported moderate (fifteen
patients) to severe (thirteen patient) pain before the treatment. By day thirty
of the treatment, eleven reported slight pain, fifteen moderate pain and two
severe pain. By day sixty, fifteen patients had slight pain and thirteen
reported moderate pain. By day ninety, one patient had no pain, twenty five
slight pain and two moderate pain.
[0050] FIG. 1C shows the reduction of the pain produced by movements. All 28
patients reported pain produced by movement before the including 11 suffering
from slight pain, 16 moderate pain and one severe pain (the severe RA patient).
By day 30 of the treatment, 15 reported slight pain, 12 had moderate pain and
one had severe pain. By day 60, 6 had no pain, 17 had slight pain and 5 had
moderate pain. By day 90, 11 had no pain, 16 had slight pain and one had
moderate pain.
[0051] FIG. 2 shows the reduction of tumefaction of soft tissues. All 28
patients had some degree of tumefaction (swell) of soft tissue before the
treatment including 10 slight, 17 moderate and one severe tumefaction. By day
30, 5 patients having moderate tumefaction reported slight tumefaction. By day
60, seven more patients changed form moderate to slight tumefaction. By day 90,
five patients had complete disappearance of tumefaction, 21 had slight
tumefaction and two remained with moderate tumefaction.
[0052] FIG. 3 shows the reduction of morning stiffness resulting from Product R
treatment. Of the 28 patients, 22 had morning stiffness, which in 15 patients
lasted 15 minutes or more before the Product R treatment. By day 30, one of the
22 patients reported no morning stiffness, and seven reported a reduction of
morning stiffness. By day 60, an additional five patients had no morning
stiffness and a total of 15 patients had a reduction of morning stiffness. By
day 90, a total of 15 patients had no stiffness as compared to 6 before the
treatment. 12 patients remained with morning stiffness of 15 minutes or less.
One patient remained with morning stiffness of more than 15 minutes.
[0053] FIG. 4 shows the mobility of the most affected joints before and after
the treatment with Product R. Mobility was measured by degrees of flexion and
extension of the joint. All 28 patients had impaired mobility of the joints.
Most patients had affected joints in hands and three patients included impaired
feet joints. Flexion ranged from 30 to 50 degrees with the remainder ranging
form 80 to 110 degrees. In most cases it took 60 days to see a marked
improvement. At that point the improvement became exponential.
[0054] As a measurement of inflammation, the circumference in millimeters of the
most affected joint was recorded. Al 27 patients experienced a marked decrease
in joint sizes. These decreases were visible in all cases by day 30. The
reduction of the circumference of the most affected joint is also shown in FIG.
4.
[0055] FIG. 5 shows the improvements of various activities that were hindered by
RA. These activities include:
[0056] Strenuous exercise:
[0057] Before Product R therapy, all 27 patients were limited in their ability
to perform strenuous exercises such as running, lifting heavy objects or
participation in exhausting sports. 16 patients considered themselves extremely
limited and 12 moderately limited. By day 90 of the therapy, two patients
reported not being limited at all, 17 were moderately limited and eight still
were very limited in their ability to perform strenuous exercise.
[0058] Moderate exercise:
[0059] 19 patients out of the 27 patients considered themselves to be moderately
limited in their ability to perform moderate exercises such as moving a table,
pushing a vacuum cleaner, bowling or playing golf. By day 90, only six patients
were limited in performing moderate exercises.
[0060] Job/Housework:
[0061] 27 patients had problems performing their job or housework at the
beginning of the study. By day 90, only seven still had problems but to a much
lower degree in all cases.
[0062] Social activities:
[0063] 27 patients had some disability in performing social activities due to
their illness at the beginning of the treatment. By day 90, only six still
reported problems but all improvements from the pretherapy state.
[0064] Emotional problems:
[0065] 21 patients reported emotional problems due to their disease at the start
of the therapy. By day 90, only two still reported emotional problems and both
reported improvement resulting from Product R therapy.
[0066] In addition to the above observations, all patients' blood samples were
collected and subjected to standard clinical laboratory tests which are designed
for diagnosis and treatment of rheumatoid arthritis and performed routinely by
persons of ordinary skill in the art. The results of these tests are summarized
in Table I.
1 TABLE I Latex Fixation Rose Ragan Hb (mg/ml) ESR (mm) Test (IU/ml) Test (IU/ml)
Patient Day 0 Day 90 Day 0 Day 90 Day 0 Day 90 Day 0 Day 90 1 14.4 14.1 38 26 +
30 + 30 ++ 32 + 8 2 13.6 14.2 32 26 + >40 + 30 >8 + 8 3 14.3 13.8 27 20 ++ 60 +
30 ++ 32 + 8 4 14.0 13.8 29 19 ++ 60 + 30 +++ 128 ++ 32 5 13.6 14.3 32 20 ++ 60
+ 30 ++ 32 + 8 6 14.2 13.8 29 18 ++ 60 ++ 60 ++ 32 + 8 7 12.0 13.3 32 19 ++ 60 +
30 +++ 128 + 8 8 14.0 13.8 27 16 + 30 + 30 ++ 32 + 8 9 13.4 14.0 36 22 +++ 120 +
30 ++++ 512 + 8 10 13.8 14.3 29 15 ++ 60 + 30 ++ 32 + 8 11 14.0 13.8 28 19 ++ 60
+ 30 ++ 32 + 8 12 13.5 14.3 26 14 ++ 60 + 30 ++ 32 + 8 13 13.6 14.3 34 19 +++
120 + 30 ++ 32 + 8 14 12.0 13.0 27 17 +++ 120 + 30 +++ 128 + 8 15 11.3 12.7 20
13 + 30 - + 8 + 8 16 13.8 14.4 26 18 ++ 60 + 30 +++ 128 + 8 17 12.7 13.6 27 14
+++ 120 + 30 +++ 128 + 8 18 12.6 13.8 29 18 ++ 60 + 30 +++ 128 + 8 19 13.7 14.8
31 17 + 30 + 30 + 8 + 8 20 13.6 14.2 27 16 + 30 + 30 + 8 + 8 21 12.6 13.9 25 14
+++ 120 + 30 +++ 128 + 8 22 13.4 13.9 31 19 ++ 60 + 30 ++ 32 + 8 23 12.8 14.2 25
14 ++ 60 + 30 +++ 128 + 8 24 14.0 13.7 27 15 +++ 120 + 30 +++ 128 + 8 25 14.4
14.8 22 16 ++ 60 + 30 ++ 32 + 8 26 13.9 14.1 31 19 +++ 120 + 30 +++ 128 ++ 32 27
13.7 14.3 23 17 ++ 60 + 30 ++ 32 + 8
[0067] 20 patients out of 27 had slight increases of hemaglobulin (Hb) values
after 90 days of the treatment as compared with pretreatment values. The rest
either remained the same or had slight decreases.
[0068] All 27 patients had lower values of erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR)
on day 90 compared with their corresponding pretreatment values. The average
decrease was 10.74 mm with the maximum being 15 mm and the minimum 6 mm.
[0069] All 27 patients had positive latex fixation tests before the treatment.
On day 90 after the start of the treatment, of the 27 patients, 22 had decreased
values compared with their corresponding pretreatment values. The other five
remained the same: one moderately positive (++, 60 IU/ml) and four low positives
(+, 30 IU/ml). Only one patient, who had a low positive value to start with (+,
30 IU/ml), became negative to the latex fixation test. The rest, whose values
ranged from 30 to 120 IU/ml all became low positives (+, 30 IU/ml).
[0070] All 27 patents had positive Rose Ragan tests before the treatment. None
of them became negative but 24 patients showed decreases of the positive values
and three remained at the minimum positive value (+, 8 IU/ml) with which they
started. 21 patients lowered their values to 8 IU/ml including eight patients
who started with high positive values of 128 IU/ml. Three patients lowered their
values to 32 IU/ml, two of whom started with 128 IU/ml and one had a very high
value of 512 IU/ml before the treatment.
[0071] Thus, while there have been shown and described and pointed out
fundamental novel features of the invention as applied to preferred embodiments
thereof, it will be understood that various omissions and substitutions and
changes in the form and details of the operation illustrated may be made by
those skilled in the art without departing from the spirit of the invention. For
example, it is expressly intended that all combinations of those elements and/or
method steps which perform substantially the same function in substantially the
same way to achieve the same results are within the scope of the invention. It
is the intention, therefore, to be limited only as indicated by the scope of the
claims appended hereto.
[0072] The invention is not limited by the embodiments described above which are
presented as examples only but can be modified in various ways within the scope
of protection defined by the appended patent claims.
* * * * *
Does Hirschman own it? |
Sue- I guess then that someone at
the company doesn't know how to count. The U.S. patent office website
clearly shows only 10 patents. Of course, theoretically, the reason could be
that two patents of the 12 were assigned by ADVR to another company. This
clerarly did not happen, since there is no indication in any PR or
communication that that ever happened. |
Nice find, lovie. Congratulations.
"Prednisone is co-administered with Product R to the patients orally in a range from about 0.065 to about 1.35 milligram per kilogram of the patient's body weight per day." - - - - - View Replies » |
Sue- There were two patents from
IMMAX, Inc with Kochel as inventor,which were awarded to Advanced Viral as
part of the settlement of the lawsuit in Michigan. Would these account for
the missing two? - - - - - |
buck, this is why I usually do not
even get involved in these discussions. I have already posted that the
patent application search now only goes back to 2001. The RA patent, I can
tell from an old post of mine, was filed in 1999 originally. The only way to
access it now would be if someone had the number. I am sure it is still
pending. |
YEPPER.......That would be the
logical conclusion (I forgot about them)!!! Thanks. |
This treatment protocol which
includes prednisone seems different from that in the Argentina RA study.
Prednisone is a powerful steroidal immunomodulator itself used to suppress
the aberrant immune response and cyokine release that characterize the
disease -so where does prednisone's effect end, and AVR118's begin? - - - - - View Replies » |
I never heard the name Bregman mentioned. I do not know the reason it was believed Reticulose would be able to be sold so soon. As I recall the distributor had to get the drug approved in their geographic location. Perhaps it was felt the FDA could be side stepped in some countries. Who knows? I knew Gene very well. I knew Hank a little. If those are the Cartwrights you refer to they are definitely not brothers. If you are referring to some others, who? These people were rich, bright, fun, humble and very astute business men. Hank sold one of his companies for $100,000,000.00. If, and that is a big IF, the group feel there are certain rights IMO they will find out. First things first, let's see if 118 becomes commercially viable. Gene was a sports bettor as I was. He picked the Super Bowl winner like 15 years in a row. (Voluntary Disclosure: Position- Long) |
yanks- I would hope that over the
last eight months Elma has made it Job # 1 to understand the drug and its
manufacturing process completely, to research the company's and the drug's
(sometimes sordid) past thoroughly,to have reviewed all FDA-related
documentation submitted by the company and to begin to correct past
deficiencies and missteps. She should be scouring internal company documents
daily to be fully informed on the issues. |
I knew you could do it luv up. [0045] A clinical trial to assess the efficacy of Product R in patients suffering from rheumatoid arthritis (RA) has been conducted under a protocol designed by applicant. In this clinical study, twenty-seven female patients ranging in age from 29 to 50 years old, suffering from mild to moderately severe RA for no loner than two years were treated with Product R for a total of 90 days. These patients had been previously treated with Aspirin and/or Paracetamol and/or Arrumalon. Product R was injected subcutaneously at a dose of 1 ml twice per day for 15 days and 1 ml once a day for 75 days. One additional patient, 44 years old, afflicted with severe RA manifested as decrease in articular space, osteopenia and subchondral sclerosis, who was previously treated with gold salts but discontinued due to toxic effects, was injected subcutaneously with Product R at a dose of 2 ml once per day for the first three days followed by 1 ml once per day for 12 months. Two other patients who had suffered from RA for seven and three years respectively where injected subcutaneously with 2 ml of Product R every other day for days, 2 ml every other day for 15 more days and for the next year they were given a maintenance dose of 1 ml a day for 5 consecutive days every 4 months. |
Mind....if I'm reading this
correctly, Prednisone is co-administered with Product R. Wouldn't that
indicate all patients received both???? "Specifically, Product R is administered parenterally to the patients in a range from about 2.5 microliter to about 40 microliter per kilogram of the patient's body weight per day in a sterile injectable formulation. Prednisone is co-administered with Product R to the patients orally in a range from about 0.065 to about 1.35 milligram per kilogram of the patient's body weight per day." |
There is some discrepancy in the
scientific argument for the use of AVR118 in rheumatoid arthritis. Research
publications from the company itself have shown that AVR118 increases the
levels of the TNF-alpha and IL-8 cytokines. Part of the cytopathology of RA
involves the detrimental effects of these cytokines on cartilage. Why then
would you use an immunostimulant that enhances the levels of these cytokines
in patients who suffer from elevated levels already? Maybe that's why it
takes a high dose of co-administered prednisone to counter-effect the
actions of AVR118. |
I hear what you are saying. I'm
beginning to wonder if AVR118 can stand alone and prove anything, without
the help of "other drugs" as an assist. If AVR118 is used as an
anti-inflammatory drug, as in the case of RA, and is also USED and
recommended to be used WITH other anti-inflammatory drugs -- (this may sound
odd) but isn't there a possibility of patients having an over-reaction to
too much of a good thing. When does "over-kill" come into consideration when
one authors a patent application of this type. Oh well, I guess we may never
find out. AFK-TTL |
Well, isn't AVR118 a "switch-type"
immunomodulator? "It can turn on proinflammatory responses of the immune system needed to defend against viral infections or turn off existing aberrant inflammatory reactions, to treat autoimmune diseases." |
The "switch-type" immunomodulating
effect of AVR118 is a postulated working hypothesis, not yet proven by the
company. To demonstrate a "switch-type" effect unambiguously, they would
have to show, for example, that the drug acts as a immunostimulant and
enhances cytokine production in some cells, say T-lymphocytes; yet is
capable of being an immunosuppressive agent, turning the production of the
same cytokines off in others, such as cartilage cells or macrophage cells
embedded in cartilage. No such study has been done, or published, or
presented at a conference, to my knowledge. - - - - - |
mind-Even if the drug could turn on
cytokine production in immune cells such as T-lymphocytes, as the company's
research has shown, and switch them off in other tisssues, say cartilage,
the released cytokines in the circulating blood would invade and flood other
tissues and exert their effects there. The cytokine molecules themselves are
not "chameleon-like" molecules, that could change their intrinsic properties
depending on which area of the body they land. Neither would the peptide
molecules in AVR118 change their colors, so to speak, and act
differentially, dependent on where they end up in the body. |
Cytokine Journal Article Abstract :
1: Cytokine. 2001 May 21;14(4):234-9. IL-8 and MCP-1 secretion is enhanced by the peptide-nucleic acid immunomodulator, Product R, in U937 cells and primary human monocytes. Lazzarino DA, de Diego M, Hirschman SZ, Zhang KY, Shaikh S, Musi E, Liaw L, Alexander RJ. Laboratory of Immunology, Advanced Viral Research Institute, Advanced Viral Research Corp., 200 Corporate Boulevard South, Yonkers, New York 10701, USA. Product R (Reticulose) is a peptide-nucleic acid immunomodulator recently shown to enhance the expression of mRNAs encoding pro-inflammatory cytokines. Interleukin 8 (IL-8) and macrophage chemoattractant protein-1 (MCP-1) are pro-inflammatory chemokines involved in immune cell mobilization and stimulation. To determine whether Product R acts by upregulating these chemokines, we assayed its effects on the expression of IL-8 and MCP-1 mRNAs and proteins by human monocytic U937 cells and by adherent peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs). U937 cells were cultured for 0-21 days in media containing 0-20% Product R or phosphate-buffered saline (PBS). Compared to control cultures, cells cultured in Product R expressed increased amounts of IL-8 and MCP-1 mRNAs, as measured by reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR). Product R also increased secretion of IL-8 and MCP-1, as measured by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA), and boosted secretion induced by bacterial lipopolysaccharide (LPS), in a time- and dose-dependent manner. In adherent PBMCs, Product R increased IL-8 and MCP-1 secretion, but reduced LPS-induced MCP-1 secretion. While mRNAs encoding the IL-8 receptor, CXCR2, and the MCP-1 receptor, CCR2, were increased in U937 cells cultured in 5-10% Product R, we observed no change in binding of receptor-specific antibodies. These findings suggest that Product R upregulates the expression of IL-8 and MCP-1, which may boost immune system activity in virally-infected patients. Copyright 2001 Academic Press. |
buck, if you are saying you are
dubious about the switching action well so am I. The results in the Cytokine
article were not great and based on a certain type of cell in a dish and
tresated cells not infected cells at that. Recall the the Weizmann rats got better but this was an artificial model of a disease, not the disease itself. There is a very good argument that rarboston has made that ADVR has functioned as an arcane pure researh company with very little headway towards the reality of bringing a drug to market. I thinlk he has some interesting points but he was hounded off the forum by those that attempt to control debate here. |
that's it buck and here is the
switch- "In adherent PBMCs, Product R increased IL-8 and MCP-1 secretion, but reduced LPS-induced MCP-1 secretion." I know, big whoop! But it is evidence that R/118 increased Il-8 and MCP-1 but reduced MCP-1 in LPS treated cells. Do you follow. Very few here have enough brains to interpret what this says, I think you do. |
While AVR118 has been described as
an 'antisense' PNA drug in some publications, no publication from the
company deals with antisense effects of the drug. "Antisense" refers to the
actions of classic synthetic PNAs, which are mimics of short segments of DNA
or RNA nucleic acids with a peptide backbone. They bind strongly to the
gene-coding segments of DNA (the "sense strand of DNA) in cells and thus
prevent the effects of the gene's activation. They block the actions of the
DNA sense-strand, and therefore are called 'anti-sense'. The patent on
AVR118 chemical structure identifying the ingredients reveals that the drug
has two main peptides. One is a normal peptide. The other is a peptide
attached to a very short RNA fragment. So, it can very loosely be called a
peptide-nucleic acid (PNA), but in no way is it sructurally to functionally
to the synthetic PNAs that other companies and researchers are working on.
|
Thank you! "The in vitro findings reveal that Reticulose significantly inhibits the replication of HIV in cell culture systems. Most important, Reticulose stimulates the immune system to produce a distinctive set of substances called chemokines (cytokines). Reticulose belongs to a recently discovered group of chemical structures called peptide nucleic acids (PNAs). PNAs are newly appreciated molecules consisting of both amino acids and nucleic acids (part protein and part gene) that already have been shown to have interesting properties; for example, they are very stable and have anti-sense activity. Reticulose, a non-toxic PNA......" http://www.aegis.com/news/pr/1996/PR960827.html |
buck, I believe the RNA fragment
peptide is also quite balled up and convoluted and likely incapable of
interaction with DNA. IMO this is not a true PNA nor an antisense drug. They
have gone to calling it a co-polymer which might be closer to the truth but
is meant to draw association to Copaxone which it ain't. Every thing this
damn company does is squirrely if you ask me. I don't like 'em. All IMO
only. |
mind, I concur with you. The RNA
fragment is only two nucleotide units long and would not stick out from the
peptide backbone enough to interact with DNA at all. It should not have been
called a PNA -the use of the term is misleading, because the compound is NOT
a conventional PNA. The more correct term would be "nucleopeptide" or "dinucleotide-conjugated
peptide". |
What I call Taraporewala's patent
describes the two peptides in great detail and peptide B is clearly labeled
like you say as a peptide-nucleic acid conjugate. Further peptide B is the
primary component that accounts for most of 118 biological activity although
peptide A does account for something as apparently does a third as yet
unidentified peptide. It does not look like a PNA to me. Looks more like soup to me which is what I have called it here for years. Gee buck, you are smart! Your first name would not be Irach would it? |
But I correct myself, it is Peptide
A that is all balled up. Peptide B as you say simply has a short fragment
sort of like Allen's Jones. |
Anti-Cachectic Effects of a Novel
Peptide Nucleic Acid Complex: By: fenderbender60 06 Jun 2004, 04:03 PM EDT Msg. 156057 of 168496 ADVR Presented Results of its AVR118 Phase 1/2 Clinical Program at ASCO via COMTEX June 6, 2004 YONKERS, N.Y., Jun 6, 2004 /PRNewswire-FirstCall via COMTEX/ -- Advanced Viral Research Corp. (OTC Bulletin Board: ADVR) announced today that the company presented interim results of its Phase 1/2 clinical program with its flagship product, AVR118, at The American Society of Clinical Oncology's (ASCO) 40th Annual Meeting in New Orleans, LA. The presentation 'Anti-Cachectic Effects of a Novel Peptide Nucleic Acid Complex: Preliminary Results of a Phase1/2 Clinical Trial,'given by James T. D'Olimpio M.D, showed the results of Phase 1/2 clinical trials conducted in Israel. A total of 25 cachectic patients (patients with cancer cachexia or AIDS wasting) were enrolled in the trials. Ten patients with advanced AIDS and two patients with advanced pancreatic cancer received AVR118 subcutaneously at a dose of 0.4 ml/day for 28 days (6 days/week). Eight AIDS patients received a dose of 2.0 ml/day and five patients received 4.0 ml/day at the same schedule. All patients were followed for 28 days after treatment was completed. Total weight, body mass index (BMI), fat percentage, strength, calf and arm circumference, and skin fold were measured for all AIDS patients. Spontaneous patient comments regarding quality of life (QOL) parameters, including improvement in mood, appetite, alertness, activities of daily living (ADLs), malaise, myalgia and power/energy were recorded. Adverse events were monitored. All dose groups showed an increase in weight, strength and fat percentage, with more significant improvements in the two higher dose levels. All patients with anorexia at entry became anorexia-free after three weeks of therapy. Spontaneous patient comments reflect widespread, dose-related improvements in Quality of Life (QOL). AVR118 continues to show a favorable safety profile. 'This trial was designed as a dose-escalation study and we are pleasantly surprised to see such strong data given the relatively short treatment period,'said Dr. Elma Hawkins, President and CEO of Advanced Viral Research Corp. 'We are very encouraged by the results, most importantly with the resolution of anorexia in all study participants.' Results Reported - AIDS: 0.4 ml dose * All patients were anorexia-free after three weeks of treatment. (One patient did not have anorexia at baseline). * Half of the patients reported increased daily activity. 2 ml dose * All patients were anorexia-free after three weeks of treatment. * At the end of four weeks of treatment the average weight of patients increased by over a pound. * All patients had an increase of fat percentage after treatment and this was sustained in the majority of patients. * Approximately half of the patients reported an improvement in their mood and increased daily activities. 4 ml dose * All patients were anorexia free after three weeks of treatment. It is important to note that 50 percent of patients had Grade Two anorexia at baseline. * Patients in this cohort increased their average weight by 2.2 pounds over four weeks of treatment. This effect continued through the following four weeks at which point the average weight had increased by 2.6 pounds over baseline. * All patients showed an increase in fat percentage which was sustained after treatment discontinuation in all patients. * 100 percent of patients reported an increase in daily activity. * 80 percent of patients reported decreased fatigue. Results Reported - Pancreatic Cancer: * Both patients had improved weight (4% increase) * Improved fat percentage (20% increase) * Improved strength (5 % increase) ADVR's AVR118 represents a biopolymer that possesses novel immunomodulator activity. This peptide-nucleic acid complex, which to date has demonstrated a very favorable safety profile, appears to stimulate the proinflammatory responses required to combat viral infections such as AIDS and human papillomavirus and to dampen aberrant autoimmune-type inflammatory responses, such as occur in patients with rheumatoid arthritis. AVR118 is in clinical trials in Israel for the treatment of cachexia (body wasting) in patients with AIDS. For further information regarding Advanced Viral Research Corp., please visit our website at http://www.adviral.com. Advanced Viral Research Corp., based in Yonkers, New York, is a biopharmaceutical firm dedicated to improving patients'lives by researching, developing and bringing to market new and effective therapies for viral and other diseases. Note: This news release contains forward-looking statements that involve risks associated with clinical development, regulatory approvals, including application to the FDA, product commercialization and other risks described from time to time in the SEC reports filed by the Company. AVR118 (Product R) is not approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration or any comparable agencies of any other countries. There is no assurance that the Company will be able to secure the financing necessary to continue and/or complete the clinical trials of AVR118 or satisfy certain other conditions relating to clinical trials including obtaining adequate insurance on terms acceptable to the Company or that if completed, clinical trials performed outside the United States will assist the Company in obtaining FDA or other regulatory approval. The Company undertakes no obligation to update or revise the information contained in this announcement whether as a result of new information, future events or circumstances or otherwise. Contact: Ronnie Welch or Kelly Cinelli CWR &Partners 508/222-4802 SOURCE Advanced Viral Research Corp. Ronnie Welch or Kelly Cinelli, both of CWR &Partners, +1-508-222-4802 /Company News On-Call: http://www.prnewswire.com/comp/903002.html http://www.adviral.com |
Worth repeating By: buckaroobanzai10 16 Jun 2004, 09:23 AM EDT Msg. 157635 of 168496 Jump to msg. # AVR118’s a remarkable drug Treats infections by many a known bug It fattens the cachectic Helps the apopleptic And wipes wrinkles right off your mug AVR118, it is said Is quite a wonderful med If what I heard is true You can treat celiac sprue And basal carcinomas on a forehead AVR118, there’s no doubt Is probably good for your gout A couple of doses Cures runny noses And also cold sores on your mouth AVR118 sure sounds like snake oil But many a disease it will foil Use it for colitis, Inflammed cellulitis- It works wonders applied to a boil AVR118- it’s just great! Grows new hair on your bald pate It’s superb for the flu For blood glucose too And helps skinny people gain weight AVR118 - a.k.a Bregman’s Brew Is there no end to what it can do? From warts and scabies Herpes simplex and rabies, Arthritis and multiple sclerosis too! AVR118’s a wonderful lotion I believe, I do have a notion It cured my doggy’s distemper And controls my bad temper And you can use it to quell a loose motion AVR118- that peptide-filled goop Can just put an end to the croup It treats every condition Of immune dysfunction It’s better than Mom’s chicken soup! And no matter who’s doing the talkin’ Whether Hirschman or Eli or Hawkin’ We’re told, “Just you wait’ This drug is just great! This ain’t no snake oil that we’re hawkin’ “ “Wonder Drug” is a term I could bandy But where’s the elusive new IND ADVR stock’s one off which I thought I’d get rich- I’d sure like to shop Prada and Fendi ! |