By: WEWIN22
15 May 2004, 12:42 AM EDT
Msg. 153023 of 153327
(This msg. is a reply to 153018 by kevtod.)
Jump to msg. #  
Looks like we won't make that "end of the second quarter" prediction after all, promised by our great CEO. I hope the thrid quarter doesn't turn into the fourth quarter. *Sigh* BTW, I wonder what kind of car they gave her? Maybe it's one of those new razzle-dazzle Maybachs to match her salary. Thanks for the C&P.

The Company estimates that enrollment of patients in this study will be completed during the second quarter of 2004. The study requires a two-week pre-treatment period, a four-week treatment period and a four-week follow-up period. It is estimated that all patients will have completed treatment and follow-up by the third quarter 2004.



(Voluntary Disclosure: Position- Long; ST Rating- Hold; LT Rating- Hold)

By: DIAMONDring
15 May 2004, 08:54 AM EDT
Msg. 153040 of 153328
Jump to msg. #  
new boss gets 40,000,000 shares? so her goal is to get the pps up to 1.00 by 2009 so, $350,000 per year a car, $50,000 bonus and $40,000,000 in 5 years of work. WOW go new boss. i should of went to college instead of partying in the 70s

Advertisements
By: yanks04
15 May 2004, 10:26 AM EDT
Msg. 153060 of 153328
(This msg. is a reply to 153020 by kevtod.)
Jump to msg. #  
Look like Bregman won't need to doctor expense reports for her personal vehicle provided for business use. Looks like firboy is a liar.
By: rarboston
15 May 2004, 11:02 AM EDT
Msg. 153067 of 153306
(This msg. is a reply to 153042 by kevtod.)
Jump to msg. #  
Slipping dates..... (They couldn't find 7 patients in the last 3 months?)

"It is estimated that all patients will have completed treatment and follow-up by the third quarter 2004. The completion of the study is dependent upon the availability of patients meeting the prescribed protocol and the ability of the hospitals to meet the requirements of the protocol."
By: rarboston
15 May 2004, 11:10 AM EDT
Msg. 153069 of 153330
Jump to msg. #  
Did the new CEO say "everything is on schedule" at her face to face soire? If she did, it was an outright lie, because the patients had not been enrolled and of course it would be inpossible to have results by the end of 2Q.

The pattern of material misrepresentations continues.

By: spoilerdave
15 May 2004, 11:57 AM EDT
Msg. 153070 of 153306
(This msg. is a reply to 152996 by firehirshman.)
Jump to msg. #  
Fire:

I've placed presidents of divisions before, but never a CEO. Mostly high tech, but I've done some work for quite a few biotech's here in the Bay Area including Genentech and Abbott Labs. Still, a percentage is a percentage and if Sue is correct with her $400,000 salary then we're looking at a 25% fee structure which went out with the Dot Com's in 2001.

(400K X .25 + 40K X .25 = $110,000)

(40K is for the administrative assistant)

I don't know what the going rate is in New York by comparison and I'd imagine salaries are similar too. But that's enough to keep a small firm open for a full year in some cases.

Just seems rediculously high.

Spoilerdave

(Voluntary Disclosure: Position- Long; ST Rating- Strong Buy; LT Rating- Strong Buy)
By: yanks04
15 May 2004, 12:36 PM EDT
Msg. 153072 of 153330
(This msg. is a reply to 153062 by kevtod.)
Jump to msg. #  
Now you raise a good question. In the spirit of honesty and since Bregman himself is here to answer, maybe it is high time he explain. He doesn't mind dropping tidbits that none of us know! How about you form this question to him. You respect him right?

As gatekeeper of company funds while in office, how many sets of tires did he authorize for Hirschmans' personal vehicles that were provided for business use? When he saw the expense report did he see it as odd? why did he authorize it? Was he derelict? How many sets of tires are needed over 5 years? As an officer of this company obligated to manage funds and while the company was short of funds, did he ask any employee in Yonkers to go and look to see which vehicle has new tires? Why?While you are in the question asking mode. Ask him how his friend firehirschman came into possession of an old expense report? Good Luck. Sort of makes me want to see all of the expense reports for all of the employees. Particularly Bregman. IT raises the specter of misuse of funds.

Advertisements
By: yanks04
15 May 2004, 12:44 PM EDT
Msg. 153074 of 153330
Jump to msg. #  
This is just starting to get interesting. Bregman has a chance to speak to all of his loyal shareholders. Live on-stage. His claim that as far as he knew, his old partner put his shares into a blind trust? Unwilling to state he sold a portion of them? Huh? Let's watch! Maybe Bill Bregman should be willing to acknowledge how many shares he has sold since taking a moniker here. I smell smoke. The thought that firehirschman and mbengineer never imagined their friends would out them on their monikers? LMFAO. Is Judge Judy in the house?
By: yanks04
15 May 2004, 12:50 PM EDT
Msg. 153075 of 153306
(This msg. is a reply to 153069 by rarboston.)
Jump to msg. #  
That's what Bregman touted. We even learned that 23 patients will be the story. Amazing! She is off to a very poor start. Wonder what she truly thinks of Bregman, Wilner, Hirschman. Did she realize she walked into a otc pump game? Who to trust? Who to believe? Large shareholders named Levine and Bregman? Pomerantz? The Cohen Bauer ritual? Wilner? Where is Kent and Nowinski when you need them? Where is Friedland and his blind trustworthiness? Funny.
By: yanks04
15 May 2004, 01:17 PM EDT
Msg. 153076 of 153330
Jump to msg. #  
Who bought another newsletter? Does Bregman know? Did Bregman sell any stock in the past 60 days? Answers please? Anyone?
- - - - -
By: aven2002
15 May 2004, 02:22 PM EDT
Msg. 153078 of 153306
(This msg. is a reply to 153076 by yanks04.)
Jump to msg. #  
Hello Yank,Goto this website it should help!!......Aven1

http://finance.yahoo.com/q/it?s=ADVR.OB

(Voluntary Disclosure: Position- Long; ST Rating- Strong Buy; LT Rating- Strong Buy)

By: Ourobouros
15 May 2004, 02:29 PM EDT
Msg. 153080 of 153330
(This msg. is a reply to 153074 by yanks04.)
Jump to msg. #  
Unfortunately Bregman wanted it both ways:;

To be able to have posted here anonymously (not any longer)

And to NOT have to answer your pertinent questions.

Those two scenarios now have changed, to wit: he no longer enjoys his anonymous pseud - let's see if he chooses to keep posting and refuses to answer those questions.

My bet is that he does not have the rigors of discipline to stop posting (one way to avoid the questions) - and will continue to obfuscate - as he did on his "quiting at 23 patients" scenario.
- - - - -
By: Dusty
15 May 2004, 02:40 PM EDT
Msg. 153081 of 153330
Jump to msg. #  
What ADVR will have on the table by mid August, IMO

1. Results from the phase I HPV topical study with FDA.
2. Results from phase I/II study for cachectic salvage therapy for AIDS.
3. Animal model study on RA, along with the human study done in Argentina.
4. Animal model study on MS.
5. There are other studies done in Argentina and Barbados but, I don't think they carry enough clout to be of much help.

Will this be enough to attract a partner?
If it does not. Is Mr. Dicke willing to fork over another 20 million or more to go through with the late stage phase II trials, useing 200 patients, proposed in March of 03.

IMO, the results of this phase I/II trial had better be nothing short of miraculous.

Dan

By: yanks04
15 May 2004, 02:43 PM EDT
Msg. 153082 of 153330
(This msg. is a reply to 153078 by aven2002.)
Jump to msg. #  
Thx. Is Bregman required to file 144's? 144 filings represent intent. I want to know how many shares he has sold. Simple. He claimed he abides by the rule of fair disclosure. Let's have his honest and fair disclosure! Y/N? Is it too hard for him to answer a fair and honest question?
By: yanks04
15 May 2004, 02:45 PM EDT
Msg. 153083 of 153330
(This msg. is a reply to 153080 by Ourobouros.)
Jump to msg. #  
Then he operates under a double standard? Let's see what he has to say in his next post? If he is any part of a man, his actions should reveal his true character. Time will tell. Thx for your genuine input.
By: yanks04
15 May 2004, 02:53 PM EDT
Msg. 153085 of 153330
(This msg. is a reply to 153081 by Dusty.)
Jump to msg. #  
Interesting. I thought item number 1 had been out? Number 2 is what is providing so much problem with shareholders. Please elaborate or justify your thinking for the timeline on number 2. Number 3 is cloudy for me. Can you point me in the direction of pr or SEC filing that leads you to expect any information on number 3? I missed that and can use your guidance. Number 4 I have no clue. Again. Can you offer any official reference? Number 5 represents a claim by firehirschman and Bill Bregman that the lousy Hirschman failed us and allowed those studies to go by the wayside when they were important. I think many of us will appreciate some explanation for your opinions. thx kindly.

By: rarboston
15 May 2004, 05:15 PM EDT
Msg. 153105 of 153306
(This msg. is a reply to 153101 by allen_only.)
Jump to msg. #  
Well this is another material misrepresentation. The kind that is inexcusable. If this kind of manipulation doesn't indicate a sell, I don't know what does.
By: yanks04
15 May 2004, 06:10 PM EDT
Msg. 153124 of 153330
(This msg. is a reply to 153121 by rarboston.)
Jump to msg. #  
It's outrageous for Bregman to tell us something that is not public. Double duty for fireboy. There are 3 years of post on file that will prove this to the SEC. Lawyers do not need to be shareholders to represent any shareholder.